ArticleBMC nursing2025
A multicenter cross-sectional study on nurses' attitudes toward end-of-life care and influencing factors: a latent profile analysis.
Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Hospice care knowledge and death attitude profiles among hospital-based healthcare workers: a latent profile analysis.BMC palliative care · 2026Article
- Palliative Care in Shanghai Communities: Needs, Influencing Factors and Preferences Among Older Adults with Chronic Diseases.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Demoralization profiles and their association with active aging in Chinese older adults with disabilities: a latent profile analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNurses' attitudes and beliefs regarding end-of-life issues significantly impact the quality of care provided to dying patients. While several studies have explored medical students' attitudes toward end-of-life care, there is a lack of in-depth analysis of the internal variations and factors influencing clinical nurses' attitudes toward death. This study aimed to identify different profiles of attitude toward care for dying patients and explore the factors influencing each profile.
methodsThis multicenter cross-sectional study recruited 1698 participants using convenience sampling from 60 hospitals across Sichuan Province, China. Data were collected from February 1 to April 30, 2024. The study utilized a self-designed General Information Questionnaire, Frommelt Attitudes Toward Care of the Dying Scale Form B (FATCOD-B), Templer-Death Anxiety Scale (T-DAS), and Meaning in Life Questionnaire (MLQ). Binary regression analysis and Latent Profile Analysis (LPA) are used to identify the latent classes and factors impacting the classes of attitudes toward caring for the dying patients.
resultsNurses' attitudes toward caring for dying patients were categorized into two distinct profiles: the positive attitude group (40.9%, N = 673) and the negative attitude group (59.1%, N = 971). The mean scores for these profiles were 103.67 ± 0.40 and 94.10 ± 0.22, respectively, with a significant difference between them (F = 480.282, P <0.001). The key factors contributing to these differences included bereavement experience within 1-year, prior death education training, sense of meaning in life, and death anxiety (P < 0.05).
conclusionNurses' attitudes toward caring for dying patients can be classified into positive and negative attitude profiles, with key influencing factors including bereavement experience, death education training, sense of meaning in life, and death anxiety. Healthcare administrators, educators, and policymakers should develop targeted interventions based on the specific features of each category and influencing factors to enhance end-of-life care practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.