Trial reportBMC nephrology2025
Investigating the impact of interdisciplinary training programs on self-efficacy and life satisfaction among Hemodialysis patients: a randomized controlled clinical trial.
Trial report in BMC nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Nutritional indicators and fluid self-efficacy among hemodialysis patients in the Qassim region, Saudi Arabia: a multicenter descriptive cross-sectional study.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChronic kidney disease represents a critical healthcare challenge globally, with significant implications for the patient well-being. Emerging evidence suggests that innovative educational interventions may substantially improve patients' self-efficacy and life satisfaction. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of an interdisciplinary training program on self-efficacy, and life satisfaction among hemodialysis patients in southern Iran.
methodsThis is a randomized controlled trial research without blinding included 100 hemodialysis patients who met the inclusion criteria participants from July to October 2024. Those who agreed to participate were randomly allocated into two groups: an intervention group (n = 50) and a control group (n = 50). The educational content validity was developed collaboratively through coordinated meetings with an interdisciplinary team that included a nephrologist, a dietitian, a nurse, a social worker, a spiritual counselor, and a psychologist. Based on this framework, a five-session interdisciplinary educational program was designed for the intervention group. Each session lasted 30 to 45 min. Data collection utilized two validated instruments: Diener Life Satisfaction Scale and Sherer General Self-Efficacy Questionnaire. These were administered at three critical time points-baseline (pre-intervention), immediately post-intervention, and three months following the training. The Shapiro-Wilk test evaluated the normality of quantitative data. The independent-samples t-test (or Mann-Whitney test) were performed to compare the basic data of the two groups. The post-intervention data were compared between study groups using ANCOVA and in this test the baseline information was considered as covariate. Also, the researchers employed repeated measures analysis of variance to measure changes in the patients' self-efficacy, and life satisfaction mean scores over time and between the two groups, with a p-value < 0.05 considered statistically significant.
resultsThe sample comprised 66 male and 34 female participants, with a mean (SD) age of 54.4 (10.6) years in the intervention group and 55.0 (10.2) years in the control group. Initially, no statistically significant differences were detected among the groups across demographic characteristics. Following the interdisciplinary training program, the self-efficacy and life satisfaction differences in mean scores in the intervention group were significantly higher than the control group as measured immediately and three months after the intervention (p < 0.05).
conclusionThis study provided compelling evidence for the transformative potential of interdisciplinary educational approaches to enhance the patient outcomes. The significant improvements in self-efficacy and life satisfaction suggest that targeted, holistic training programs can be a powerful tool in patient care strategies. In recognition of their potential to enhance psychological resilience and overall quality of life, healthcare administrators are strongly encouraged to consider the implementation of similar interdisciplinary educational interventions across diverse patient populations. IRANIAN REGISTRY OF CLINICAL TRIALS: IRCT registration number: IRCT20190917044802N11.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.