ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2025
Overestimation of variability in ensembles of color value and size.
Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Studies have shown that people can derive summary statistics - such as the mean - from sets of similar objects for low-level (orientation, color value), mid-level (size), and high-level visual features (emotional expression) through the phenomena of ensemble perception. Recent research has identified a bias to overestimate variability in both static and dynamic arrays of lines at various orientations - referred to as the variability overestimation effect. Here, we explored whether the variability overestimation effect generalizes to other visual features, namely color value, and size and whether it generalizes to different response types. Such generalization would be consistent with the idea that this overestimation is inherent in ensemble perception processes. In the current experiments, participants saw a set of nine circles that varied in either size or color value and estimated the variability of the set. Overall, participants overestimated variability in color value and size. This overestimation was more pronounced when the set had lesser variability. The fact that the visual system overestimates variability across different features raises the possibility that this bias is encompassed within ensemble perception. The exaggerated bias when variability is low for orientation, size, and color value is consistent with a common mechanism underlying these biases. Understanding the perception of variability in ensembles has theoretical implications for ensemble perception processes and has applied implications such as how to design visualizations that require making judgments about critical but uncertain information such as the possible trajectory of the path of a hurricane.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.