Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40474047›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic innovation & regulatory science2025

Leveraging Synthetic Data to Facilitate Research: A Collaborative Model for Analyzing Sensitive National Cancer Registry Data in England.

George Kafatos, Julia Levy, Sophie Jose, Pooja Hindocha, Olia Archangelidi, Sally Vernon, Lora Frayling

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

George KafatosCenter for Observational Research, Amgen Ltd, Uxbridge, UK. gkafatos@amgen.com.
Julia LevyIQVIA Ltd, London, UK.
Sophie JoseHealth Data Insight CIC, Cambridge, UK.
Pooja HindochaIQVIA Ltd, London, UK.
Olia ArchangelidiCenter for Observational Research, Amgen Ltd, Uxbridge, UK.
Sally VernonNational Disease Registration Service England, London, UK.
Lora FraylingHealth Data Insight CIC, Cambridge, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Real-world data (RWD) are increasingly recognized as critical to advancing drug development and health care delivery, with regulatory bodies increasingly recognising their value. However, stringent governance requirements, while essential for protecting patient privacy, create significant challenges for conducting research. The Cancer Analysis System (CAS), managed by National Health Service (NHS) England, includes a national cancer registry and linked health care datasets. To address data access challenges, Simulacrum, a set of publicly available synthetic datasets generated from the CAS, can be used to carry out preliminary data analysis, hypothesis generation and development of programming code that can be executed to run analyses on CAS data. This paper presents a collaborative operating model that leverages Simulacrum to enable efficient, privacy-compliant analytics. Analysis of 18 projects conducted using this model demonstrated an average duration of 2.3 months from the start of Code Development to Data Release (CDDR). By enabling researchers to conduct privacy-compliant analysis on synthetic data, this approach increases transparency by providing insights into patient-level data while reduces reliance on custodians of sensitive data. Our findings highlight how synthetic data can be leveraged to facilitate efficient research on restricted patient-level RWD, while safeguarding patient privacy. This framework offers a scalable solution for other data custodians that can enable broader use of RWD, accelerating healthcare innovation.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsRegistriesEnglandHumansCancer analysis systemCancer researchReal-world dataSimulacrumSynthetic data

Identifiers

PMID40474047
PMCPMC12446092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.