ReviewInflammopharmacology2025
Bioactive compound nanoparticles for Alzheimer's disease.
Review in Inflammopharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Polydopamine Modified with Brain Targeting Peptide Rabies Virus Glycoprotein for Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease by Inhibiting Oxidative Stress and Inflammatory Response.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Article
- Cell-Mediated and Peptide-Based Delivery Systems: Emerging Frontiers in Targeted Therapeutics.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- Nano-structured strategies in combatting neurodegeneration.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease is regarded as a type of dementia that has significantly affected a large population, thus posing a global health concern. The amyloid beta hypothesis and tau pathology define the disease pathology. The hallmarks of this disease are defined by the presence of neurofibrillary tangles and senile plaques, thus supporting the theories presented above. Oxidative stress and neuroinflammation can also serve as therapeutic targets for treatment. Current conventional treatments have focused on managing the symptoms rather than modifying the disease. One of the major challenges this delivery systems face is their inability to cross the blood-brain barrier; hence, the development of nanoparticle delivery systems incorporates the required active component and utilizes different mechanisms such as transcytosis, cell-mediated transport, or advanced techniques to surpass the blood-brain barrier. Bioactive components possess multiple advantages such as being anti-inflammatory and antioxidant in nature. They also target the main pathology involved in the aggregation of amyloid fibres and hyperphosphorylation of tau proteins. Various bioactive nanoparticles have been demonstrated in disease models to operate on certain targets and facilitate blood-brain barrier crossing. The article also covers the salient features of some of the nanoparticle systems under investigation separating them based on the norms of those aimed at addressing various disease pathologies. Despite being able to address the main issues with traditional drug delivery, they nevertheless have some disadvantages, such as toxicity, bioavailability, and regulatory barriers. However, the prospects for bioactive nanoparticles appear bright.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40474028What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.