Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40474019›Full record

ReviewUpdates in surgery2026

"We were already there where the narrow path …" Benign tracheal stenosis treatment: narrative review on the state of the art and future direction.

Giacomo Cusumano, Daniele Salvatore Paternò, Alberto Terminella, Massimiliano Sorbello, Luigi La Via

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Updates in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Giacomo CusumanoUniversity Hospital Policlinico "G. Rodolico - San Marco", Via S. Sofia 78, 95123, Catania, Italy. giacomo.cusumano@unict.it.
Daniele Salvatore PaternòHospital "Giovanni Paolo II", Asp Ragusa, Ragusa, Italy.
Alberto TerminellaUniversity Hospital Policlinico "G. Rodolico - San Marco", Via S. Sofia 78, 95123, Catania, Italy.
Massimiliano SorbelloHospital "Giovanni Paolo II", Asp Ragusa, Ragusa, Italy.
Luigi La ViaUniversity Hospital Policlinico "G. Rodolico - San Marco", Via S. Sofia 78, 95123, Catania, Italy. luigilavia7@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2156-7554

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acquired benign tracheal stenosis represents a challenging condition characterized by narrowing of the tracheal lumen, with post-intubation and post-tracheostomy stenosis accounting for approximately 90% of acquired cases. This comprehensive review examines current treatment strategies, from conservative management to surgical reconstruction, highlighting their indications, limitations, and outcomes based on recent clinical evidence. Conservative management, including humidification, corticosteroid therapy, and treatment of underlying conditions, plays a crucial role in selected cases with mild stenosis. Endoscopic techniques, such as dilation, laser treatment, and airway stenting, offer minimally invasive options with success rates varying from 40 to 80%, depending on patient selection. Surgical approaches, including tracheal resection with primary anastomosis and laryngotracheal reconstruction, remain the gold standard for definitive treatment, with success rates exceeding 90% in specialized centers. The choice of treatment modality depends on various factors, including stenosis length, location, severity, and patient characteristics. Emerging treatments, including tracheal replacement, bioengineered tracheal replacements, three-dimensional printing technology, and cell therapy approaches, show promise in addressing the limitations of traditional techniques, though long-term data remains limited. The integration of various biotechnology approaches has led to the development of hybrid solutions, combining 3D-printed scaffolds with cellular components and growth factors. However, significant challenges remain in the translation of these technologies to clinical practice, including issues of vascularization, immune response, and long-term stability. This review provides an up-to-date analysis of available treatment options and future directions in tracheal stenosis management.

Indexed as

Plastic Surgery ProceduresTracheal StenosisEndoscopyHumansPrinting, Three-DimensionalStentsTracheaTracheostomyAirway reconstructionBioengineered airwaysEndoscopic treatmentLaryngotracheal surgeryTracheal stenosis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.