Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40473939›Full record

ReviewAbdominal radiology (New York)2025

Vascular and lymphatic complications after renal transplant.

Claire E White-Dzuro, Demetrios J Geanon, Brian M Fagel, Lena Khanolkar, Shelby K Frantz, Christopher M Baron, Reza A Imani-Shikhabadi, Nicholas Voutsinas

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Claire E White-DzuroVanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, USA. claire.e.white-dzuro@vanderbilt.edu.
Demetrios J GeanonVanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, USA.
Brian M FagelVanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, USA.
Lena KhanolkarVanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, USA.
Shelby K FrantzVanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, USA.
Christopher M BaronVanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, USA.
Reza A Imani-ShikhabadiVanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, USA.
Nicholas VoutsinasVanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Renal transplant is a life-saving treatment option for patients with end-stage renal disease. As with any intervention, transplantation is not without potential complications, which include disruption to arterial, venous and lymphatic structures in the region and can involve either native or transplanted anatomy. Management options range from open surgical intervention to endovascular procedures, the latter of which have become increasingly more prevalent due to their minimally invasive nature. Interventional Radiology has a diverse procedural skillset that can be utilized for successful management of post-transplant complications. Treatment modalities include, but are not limited to, embolization, thrombectomy and stent placement. The goal of this article is to explore common vascular and lymphatic complications that occur following renal transplant and review relevant minimally invasive management options. Positive treatment outcomes are essential to ensure graft, and in turn, patient survival.

Indexed as

Kidney TransplantationLymphatic DiseasesPostoperative ComplicationsVascular DiseasesHumansEndovascular managementInterventional radiologyLymphatic complicationRenal transplantVascular complication

Identifiers

PMID40473939
PMCPMC12602614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.