ReviewBioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy2025
Beyond Cost: Observations on Clinical and Patient Benefits of Biosimilars in Real-World Settings.
Review in BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biological and Targeted Therapies in the Multidisciplinary Management of Gastrointestinal Cancers.Cancers · 2026Review
- Osteoporosis treatment with biosimilars in Malaysia and Thailand: a budget impact analysis.Archives of osteoporosis · 2026Article
- An Open-Label, Comparative, Parallel Clinical Trial of the Safety, Pharmacokinetics and Immunogenicity of the Ustekinumab Biosimilar GNR-068 and the Originally Developed Ustekinumab as a Reference Drug After a Single Subcutaneous Administration in Healthy Male Volunteers.Antibodies (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- From analytical similarity to clinical confidence: how regulatory evolution ensures comparable immunogenicity in streamlined biosimilar development.Bioanalysis · 2026Review
- Financial Toxicity Associated with Biological Medicines: A Scoping Review.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Article
- AVT04, a Biosimilar to Reference Product Ustekinumab, for the Treatment of Plaque Psoriasis: Insights from a Real-World Experience up to 28 Weeks.Dermatology and therapy · 2026Article
- Clinical Remission in Severe Asthma: A Comparative Analysis of Patients with and Without Biologics from the Swiss Severe Asthma Registry.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- The impact of relapse on patient disability, clinical outcomes, and subsequent burdens to patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder and caregivers.Multiple sclerosis journal - experimental, translational and clinicalArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The introduction of biosimilars into healthcare systems globally is recognized by many as a healthcare success. Despite this, questions have been raised about whether biosimilars can deliver sufficient value to patients and healthcare professionals, as well as sufficient cost saving, for their use in treatment to be worthwhile. In this review, we discuss how the increasing financial burden of complex therapeutic medicines, such as biologics, can be ameliorated by off-patent biosimilar medicines, particularly with increasing worldwide incidences of cancer and other chronic diseases. We then describe real-world cases that demonstrate the significant direct and indirect benefits of biosimilars to patients and healthcare systems beyond costs. Healthcare sustainability is crucial to ensuring that healthcare systems can continue to deliver high-quality care to patients. The savings realized from the introduction of biosimilars have expanded treatment options and improved access to therapies across a spectrum of diseases. Cost savings from biosimilar use have also led to changes in treatment guidelines, increasing the availability of biologic medicines for earlier lines of therapy. This expansion of access can have a positive impact on the overall patient experience and can reduce the overall disease burden. However, the adoption of biosimilars has not been universally successful, and faces challenges in the current healthcare landscape and in the pharmaceutical development pipeline.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.