Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40473911›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2025

Detecting genetic interactions with visible neural networks.

Arno van Hilten, Federico Melograna, Bowen Fan, Wiro Niessen, Kristel van Steen, Gennady Roshchupkin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Arno van Hilten *Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands. a.vanhilten@erasmusmc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2630-8217
Federico Melograna *BIO3 - Laboratory for Systems Medicine, Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. federico.melograna@kuleuven.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9117-9242
Bowen FanDepartment of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zurich, Basel, Switzerland.
Wiro NiessenDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Kristel van SteenBIO3 - Laboratory for Systems Medicine, Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. kristel.vansteen@uliege.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9868-5033
Gennady RoshchupkinDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands. g.roshchupkin@erasmusmc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3403-2313

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-linear interactions among single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), genes, and pathways play an important role in human diseases, but identifying these interactions is a challenging task. Neural networks are state-of-the-art predictors in many domains due to their ability to analyze big data and model complex patterns, including non-linear interactions. In genetics, visible neural networks are popular as they provide insight into the most important SNPs, genes, and pathways for prediction. Visible neural networks use prior knowledge (e.g., gene and pathway annotations) to define node connections in the network, making them sparse and interpretable. Currently, most of these networks provide measures for the importance of SNPs, genes, and pathways but do not provide information about interactions. In this paper, we explore different methods to detect non-linear interactions with visible neural networks. We adapt and speed up existing methods, create a comprehensive benchmark with simulated data from GAMETES and EpiGEN, and demonstrate that these methods can extract multiple types of interactions from trained neural networks. Finally, we apply these methods to a genome-wide case-control study of inflammatory bowel disease and find high consistency of the epistasis pairs candidates between interpretation methods. The follow-up association test on these candidates identifies seven significant epistasis pairs.

Indexed as

Epistasis, GeneticNeural Networks, ComputerPolymorphism, Single NucleotideCase-Control StudiesGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansInflammatory Bowel Diseases

Identifiers

PMID40473911
PMCPMC12141535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.