ArticleCommunications biology2025
Detecting genetic interactions with visible neural networks.
Article in Communications biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Visible neural networks for multi-omics integration: a critical review.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Pooled it
- Using deep learning models as a genetic architecture for the simulation of breeding schemes.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Article
- Machine learning for evolutionary genetics and molecular evolution.Trends in genetics : TIG · 2026Review
- Genomic prediction of feed efficiency in boars by deep learning.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Article
- Bridging the gap in precision medicine: TranSYS training programme for next-generation scientists.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Non-linear interactions among single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), genes, and pathways play an important role in human diseases, but identifying these interactions is a challenging task. Neural networks are state-of-the-art predictors in many domains due to their ability to analyze big data and model complex patterns, including non-linear interactions. In genetics, visible neural networks are popular as they provide insight into the most important SNPs, genes, and pathways for prediction. Visible neural networks use prior knowledge (e.g., gene and pathway annotations) to define node connections in the network, making them sparse and interpretable. Currently, most of these networks provide measures for the importance of SNPs, genes, and pathways but do not provide information about interactions. In this paper, we explore different methods to detect non-linear interactions with visible neural networks. We adapt and speed up existing methods, create a comprehensive benchmark with simulated data from GAMETES and EpiGEN, and demonstrate that these methods can extract multiple types of interactions from trained neural networks. Finally, we apply these methods to a genome-wide case-control study of inflammatory bowel disease and find high consistency of the epistasis pairs candidates between interpretation methods. The follow-up association test on these candidates identifies seven significant epistasis pairs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.