ArticleTargeted oncology2025
Circulating Tumor DNA in Advanced EGFRex20+ NSCLC: Concordance with Tissue Biopsy, Monitoring of Response, and Resistance to High-Dose Osimertinib.
Article in Targeted oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advancing the applications of liquid biopsies in oncology.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026Review
- EGFR-mutant NSCLC progressing on first-line osimertinib: rebiopsy in real-world and impact of second-line therapies (the "Rebiopsy on Osi" study).The oncologist · 2026Article
- The role of neddylation in colorectal cancer and its therapeutic potential.Discover oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHigh-dose osimertinib shows modest anti-tumor activity and acceptable toxicity in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring an epidermal growth factor receptor exon 20 mutation (EGFRex20+). Plasma-derived circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is promising in monitoring responses and detecting resistance mechanisms to therapy.
objectiveWe aimed to assess the concordance between variants detected in ctDNA to those found in corresponding tissue samples at baseline and progression, to analyze alterations in mutant ctDNA levels of EGFRex20+ variants as predictors of therapy response, and to identify resistance mechanisms to high-dose osimertinib as well as examine changes in mutant ctDNA levels of EGFRex20+ variants. PATIENTS AND
methodsTwenty-five patients with EGFRex20+ NSCLC received double dose (160 mg) osimertinib daily. Blood plasma was collected at baseline, 6 weeks after therapy start (T6), and at progression. ctDNA analysis was performed using the NGS Guardant360 CDx panel. The molecular profile at progression was compared with baseline/T6, and changes in ctDNA levels of the EGFRex20+ variants were linked to response or resistance.
resultsCollected ctDNA samples were analyzed retrospectively. Baseline ctDNA showed somatic alterations in 19/20 patients (95%) and the corresponding tumor biopsy NGS EGFRex20+ variant in 65%. Among 14 patients with profiling at all timepoints, there was no significant correlation between changes in mutant ctDNA levels and osimertinib response. At T6, nine patients showed decreased EGFRex20+ levels, with eight also showing tumor shrinkage. At disease progression, 9/14 (64%) patients had increased EGFRex20+ levels, correlating with tumor growth. Variants potentially associated with resistance were found in 11/18 patients (61%): single nucleotide variants (SNV, n = 14), insertions (n = 2), and gene fusions (n = 1). Mutations previously related to osimertinib resistance were found, including EGFR p.C797S (n = 1).
conclusionsctDNA analysis tracks variant dynamics and can identify resistance mechanisms in patients with EGFRex20+ NSCLC treated with high-dose osimertinib, offering valuable new insights.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.