SynthesisEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2025
Threaded cup in total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review of long-term survivorship.
Synthesis in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cumulative revision rates in total hip arthroplasty depending on acetabular cup fixation: an analysis from the German arthroplasty registry.Arthroplasty (London, England) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThreaded cups in total hip arthroplasty (THA) have been introduced to overcome the complications associated with the cemented cups in use until then. Their structure allowed the cup to be screwed into the acetabulum after careful preparation, achieving strong primary stability. However, the materials available at the time did not provide certainties about the long-term durability of these implants. This systematic review aims to evaluate the long-term results of many threaded cups used over the years, focusing on survivorship, clinical outcomes, and complications. MATERIAL AND
methodsA systematic review was conducted adhering to the PRISMA guidelines. Relevant studies were searched in four databases: PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Medline. The selected articles were evaluated according to the criteria of levels of evidence. The included studies were analyzed using the MINORS criteria for quality assessment. This paper was registered in the International Prospective Registry of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO).
resultsThe review identified 28 studies and the reported implants were developed by different manufacturers. The threaded cups had different characteristics, belonging to different generations, but all had a minimum follow-up of at least 10 years, with a wide range in cup survivorship. The most frequent long-term complications were aseptic loosening and polyethylene wear, closely related to the available materials and the design of the implant. The different survivorship among the implants was due to the multiple variables in the implant structure and the post-operative indications reported in the studies.
conclusionThreaded cups were an important milestone in the evolution of implants in hip replacement. Although they have benefited from technological improvements over the past few decades, their use is still burdened by significant complications in the long term, and their shape makes revision more difficult compared to more modern and currently widespread implants that are hemispherical and threadless. Aseptical loosening and liner wear are the two main complications in the follow-up, so it is important to keep following these implants even after a long time and no complaints by the patient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40473846What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.