ArticleScientific reports2025
Noise-induced self-supervised hybrid UNet transformer for ischemic stroke segmentation with limited data annotations.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We extend the Hybrid Unet Transformer (HUT) foundation model, which combines the advantages of the CNN and Transformer architectures with a noisy self-supervised approach, and demonstrate it in an ischemic stroke lesion segmentation task. We introduce a self-supervised approach using a noise anchor and show that it can perform better than a supervised approach under a limited amount of annotated data. We supplement our pre-training process with an additional unannotated CT perfusion dataset to validate our approach. Compared to the supervised version, the noisy self-supervised HUT (HUT-NSS) outperforms its counterpart by a margin of 2.4% in terms of dice score. HUT-NSS, on average, gained a further margin of 7.2% dice score and 28.1% Hausdorff Distance score over the state-of-the-art network USSLNet on the CT perfusion scans of the Ischemic Stroke Lesion Segmentation (ISLES2018) dataset. In limited annotated data sets, we show that HUT-NSS gained 7.87% of the dice score over USSLNet when we used 50% of the annotated data sets for training. HUT-NSS gained 7.47% of the dice score over USSLNet when we used 10% of the annotated datasets, and HUT-NSS gained 5.34% of the dice score over USSLNet when we used 1% of the annotated datasets for training. The code is available at https://github.com/vicsohntu/HUTNSS_CT .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.