Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40473816›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Interpretable machine learning models for predicting childhood myopia from school-based screening data.

Qi Feng, Xin Wu, Qianwen Liu, Yuanyuan Xiao, Xixing Zhang, Yan Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Qi FengChangsha Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention, No. 509, Wanjiali Second North Road, Kaifu District, Changsha, 410001, Hunan, China.
Xin WuChangsha Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention, No. 509, Wanjiali Second North Road, Kaifu District, Changsha, 410001, Hunan, China.
Qianwen LiuChangsha Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention, No. 509, Wanjiali Second North Road, Kaifu District, Changsha, 410001, Hunan, China.
Yuanyuan XiaoChangsha Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention, No. 509, Wanjiali Second North Road, Kaifu District, Changsha, 410001, Hunan, China.
Xixing ZhangChangsha Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention, No. 509, Wanjiali Second North Road, Kaifu District, Changsha, 410001, Hunan, China.
Yan ChenChangsha Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention, No. 509, Wanjiali Second North Road, Kaifu District, Changsha, 410001, Hunan, China. chenyanjkxw@163.com.

Funding

Health Research Project of Hunan Provincial Health Commission W20243235
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study assessed the efficacy of various diagnostic indicators and machine learning (ML) models in predicting childhood myopia. A total of 2,365 children aged 5-12 years were included in the study. The participants were exposed to non-cycloplegic and cycloplegic refraction tests, along with ocular biometric assessments. Cycloplegia was induced using 1% cyclopentolate eye drops, followed by cycloplegic refraction testing. Myopia prevalence was 11.2% (95% confidence interval: 9.9-12.5%). The spherical equivalent (SE) before and after cycloplegia varied with age, significantly differing by 0.5D in children < 10 years (P < 0.05). The most effective single-indicator screening diagnostic methods were axial length/ corneal curvature radius (AL/CCR) and screening myopia, with area under curve (AUC) of 0.919 (95% CI: 0.899 to 0.939) and 0.911 (95% CI: 0.890 to 0.932). In the multi-indicator joint diagnostic model, the best diagnostic model using non-cycloplegic SE, uncorrected distance visual acuity (UCDVA), AL, and age was the Extreme Gradient Boosting model, with an AUC of 0.983 and an accuracy of 0.970. The best diagnostic model using non-cycloplegic SE, AL/CCR, UCDVA, and age was the Random Forest model, with an AUC of 0.981 and an accuracy of 0.975. The AL/CCR demonstrated superior performance in predicting childhood myopia. The ML-based multi-indicator joint diagnostic predictive model enhances the accuracy of childhood myopia diagnosis, screening, and intervention.

Indexed as

Machine LearningMyopiaChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMalePrevalenceRefraction, OcularSchoolsVisual AcuityChildMachine learningMyopia predictionSpherical equivalent refraction

Identifiers

PMID40473816
PMCPMC12141642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.