ArticleScientific reports2025
Sediment stability is optimized by manipulating planting design during coastal marsh establishment.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Environmental stress and plant-plant interactions jointly shape intertidal cordgrass traits across broad spatial scales.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Seaside communities increasingly harness the shoreline protection functions of coastal ecosystems by constructing nature-based infrastructure. Practitioners often install vegetation into these "living shorelines" because coastal plants have traits that limit erosion by attenuating waves and increasing soil shear strength. However, failure is common during plant establishment, highlighting a need for planting designs that enhance short-term sediment stability. Here we combined hydrodynamic modelling with mesocosm experiments to assess planting approaches for the marsh grass Spartina alterniflora. The model compared random and regular planting arrangements containing plant clumps of different sizes and densities. The experiments evaluated the influence of plant collection source, arrangement, and sediment environment on plant traits. Model results showed random arrangements outperform regular arrangements, reducing areas of high-velocity flow. Large-diameter, high-stem-density Spartina clumps attenuated flow better than small-diameter clumps, even when site-wide vegetation coverage was identical. Experiments revealed multiple factors that influence the diameter and density of clumps, including plant source, sediment organic matter, and plant spatial arrangement. Some plant sources had larger diameters and more biomass than others, yet relative performance of sources varied with time and environment; thus, planting multiple sources would increase the likelihood that high-performers are included in variable and often-unexamined planting sites. Furthermore, a clumped planting arrangement was most effective for generating large, dense clumps that facilitate sediment stability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.