ArticleCommunications engineering2025
Rapid in-air ultrasound holography measurement and camera-in-the-loop generation using thermography.
Article in Communications engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Rapid in-air ultrasound holography measurement and camera-in-the-loop generation using thermography.Communications engineering · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ultrasound holography, pivotal in applications like mid-air haptics, volumetric displays and 3D printing, faces challenges in the crafting and timely measurement of precise acoustic holograms. Current methods, bench-marked via simulations due to slow measurement times, often neglect real-world complexities such as non-linearity and hardware tolerances, leading to discrepancies between predicted and observed results. Here we introduce a real-time 2D thermographic measurement technique orders of magnitude faster than microphone scans, although with reduced accuracy and no phase information, with a maximum peak pressure of 4.25 kPa validated and a demonstrated average accuracy of 2.5% in peak measurement. Higher pressures of approximately 12 kpa were captured, but validation was limited by the microphone. This method is grounded in thermo-viscous acoustic models for thin-ducts and micro-perforated plates. Finally, we integrate this with holography algorithms to propose a camera-in-the-loop algorithm that employs real-time measurement, enabling targeted data acquisition and on-line training of acoustic holography algorithms. This method achieved a 1.7% error in pressure with a single point compared to 7.8% for a conventional algorithm, and a 3.6% error and 4.2% standard deviation for 16 points compared to 9.7% and 6.9%. We further envisage this method as being capable of measuring acoustic streaming.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.