Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40473791›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Genomic and metabolic network properties in thermophiles and psychrophiles compared to mesophiles.

Amal Saeed Alblooshi, Muhammad Ibtisam Nasar, Syed Sabih Ur Rehman, Mohammad Tauqeer Alam

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Amal Saeed AlblooshiDepartment of Biology, College of Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Muhammad Ibtisam NasarDepartment of Biology, College of Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Syed Sabih Ur RehmanDepartment of Biology, College of Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Mohammad Tauqeer AlamDepartment of Biology, College of Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. mtalam@uaeu.ac.ae.

Funding

Scholarships Office (SCO) in UAE 00018549United Arab Emirates University 12R236United Arab Emirates University G00004152
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Thermophiles and psychrophiles, adapted to extreme temperatures, thrive in hot and cold environments, respectively. Despite their importance to biotechnology and environmental research, their adaptation mechanisms remain unclear. We have performed a comparative analysis of the genomes and metabolic networks of these species. Psychrophiles were found to have larger genomes, more genes, bigger metabolic networks, fewer metabolite exchanges, and higher growth rates compared to thermophiles. These species show amino acid and codon preferences: thermophiles favor GC-rich codons, while psychrophiles prefer AT-rich ones. This aligns with their genomic G + C content, which is higher in thermophiles and linked to their growth. Compared to mesophiles, species which are living in normal conditions, extremophiles show significantly reduced metabolite exchange, with psychrophiles importing fewer nutrients and thermophiles exporting fewer metabolites. Both groups exhibit distinct active metabolic reactions enriched with unique and important processes. In summary, both thermophiles and psychrophiles exhibit unique genomic profiles and metabolic network properties that likely support their adaptation to extreme temperatures.

Indexed as

BacteriaGenome, BacterialMetabolic Networks and PathwaysAdaptation, PhysiologicalAmino AcidsBase CompositionGenomicsAmino AcidsExtremophilesGenome featuresGenome-scale modelMetabolic adaptationPsychrophilesThermophiles

Identifiers

PMID40473791
PMCPMC12141708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.