Trial reportAesthetic plastic surgery2026
A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparison of Subcuticular Suture and Adhesive Strip for Cosmetic Outcome in Median Sternotomy Closure in Patient Undergoing Cardiac Surgery.
Trial report in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Wound-closure strategy influences functional recovery and complication risk after Winograd surgery: a comparative cohort study.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe median sternotomy incision is a common approach in cardiac surgery, often leading to noticeable scar formation that can impact patients' quality of life. This study aims to compare outcomes between subcuticular suture and adhesive strip (Steri-stripTM, 3M HealthCare®) closure techniques for median sternotomy incisions in cardiac surgery patients.
methodsIn this prospective randomized controlled trial, 112 patients undergoing cardiac surgery (August 2020 to September 2021) were assigned to either the adhesive strip or subcuticular suture group. Wound assessments occurred on postoperative days 3, 7, and before discharge, monitoring for infection and dehiscence. Follow-ups at 1-2 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months used scar scales, including Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS), Manchester Scar Scale (MSS), and Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS).
resultsOut of a total of 112 patients, 6 were excluded. All remaining patients were completely followed up. No significant differences were observed in VSS, MSS, POSAS outcomes, or wound complications during postoperative follow-ups. Adhesive strip closure took 0.49 minutes, significantly less than 7.27 minutes for subcuticular sutures (P < 0.001). Furthermore, the total cost of adhesive strips was lower than the subcuticular suture group.
conclusionThe adhesive strips application for skin closure of median sternotomy wounds was found to be non-inferior to subcuticular sutures in terms of clinical outcomes and postoperative wound complications. Additionally, this approach resulted in reduced operative time and proved to be cost-effective in hospital care. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE I: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
40473789What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.