ArticleScientific reports2025
Development and application of advanced learning models for predicting the land subsidence due to coal mining.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Underground coal mining presents significant environmental challenges, particularly land subsidence, which can lead to severe ecological and structural consequences. This phenomenon alters surface topography, disrupts groundwater flow, and poses risks to infrastructure, necessitating accurate predictive models for effective mitigation. Longwall mining, a widely used extraction method, is especially prone to inducing ground subsidence due to its caving process. This study leverages advanced machine learning techniques to enhance subsidence prediction accuracy and inform sustainable mining practices. Three hybrid models-biogeography-based optimization with gene expression programming (BBO-GEP), gray wolf optimizer with gene expression programming (GWO-GEP), and salp swarm algorithm with gene expression programming (SSA-GEP)-are applied to assess subsidence risks. Three hybrid models-BBO-GEP, GWO-GEP, and SSA-GEP-were developed and tested to enhance prediction accuracy and reduce model uncertainty. A comprehensive dataset comprising 11 key geotechnical and mining parameters, including seam thickness, mining depth, and various rock properties, was collected from 14 coal mines. Results indicate that the BBO-GEP model achieved the highest predictive accuracy, with a correlation coefficient of 0.99. Sensitivity analysis revealed that mining depth is the most influential factor in subsidence occurrence, whereas density has the least impact. These findings contribute to environmental risk management in mining by providing a robust predictive framework that aids in proactive subsidence mitigation strategies. The proposed models support decision-making for policymakers and industry stakeholders, fostering more sustainable mining operations with minimized ecological disruption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.