ArticleScientific reports2025
Cell spheroid micromechanics under large deformations.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- CFM: confinement force microscopy-a dynamic, precise and stable microconfiner for traction force microscopy in spatial confinement.Nature methods · 2026Article
- Microfluidic Cytotongue system enables early, label-free detection of CAR-T-induced mechanical softening in tumor spheroids.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mechanically characterizing biological tissues at the microscale helps to better link microscale biomechanics to mechanobiology but also contributes to the mechanistic understanding of disease mechanobiology. Cell spheroids (CSs) are state-of-the-art in vitro three-dimensional cell cultures allowing for the synthesis of microtissue models into sphere-like geometry. Such a geometry is attractive for micromechanical assessment via parallel-plate compression, since only minimal and nondestructive sample preparation is required to conduct such tests. However, appropriate data analysis and interpretation methods are mostly lacking. Current approaches, relying on Hertzian theory and its modifications, are inadequate for capturing large deformations observed in CSs upon compression. Here, we utilized the extended Tatara model, incorporating hyperelasticity and nonlinear boundary effects, to investigate CS mechanics. To evaluate the effectiveness of the model, we compared results to Hertz, Ding, and simple Tatara models. The extended Tatara model demonstrated superior accuracy, enabling mechanical analysis of CSs under compression of up to 50% strain. Estimating the apparent Poisson's ratio via image segmentation and shape analysis helped refine the calculated apparent modulus. This work establishes a robust analytical framework that will, in the future, help advance our understanding of cardiac fibrosis progression and support the development of therapeutic strategies using patient-derived CSs as test models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.