ArticleScientific reports2025
Evaluating the performance of three packing methods for long-distance transport of sterile adult Aedes albopictus males.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study evaluated the performance of three packing methods for long distance transport of sterile adult Aedes albopictus males, considering the specific effects of pupal vs. adult irradiation and two compaction methods. The results indicated that while transportation significantly impacted the quality of sterile males, all the three packing methods (IAEA V.1.0, IAEA V.2.0, and CAA) tested under simulated transportation durations of 25-48 h resulted in average mortality rates below 12%, with male escape rates ranging between 30 and 50% after a 24-h recovery period. The transported males were able to survive for about 2 days under stress conditions. Additionally, adult irradiation led to higher male survival and escape rates than pupal irradiation, for both before and after transportation. The study also found that stacked cups were more effective as compaction method than the square plastic boxes, despite having a reduced maximum transport capacity. Providing sterile males with 10% sugar for a 24-h recovery period after transportation, also played a role in enhancing escape rate and survival. Although Ae. albopictus prove to be more sensitive to packaging and shipping procedures compared to Aedes aegypti, this study provides valuable insights for developing and improving handling packing and shipping guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.