Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40473682›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A comprehensive model for assessing water engineering facilities heritage in grand canal's huitong river during the ming and qing dynasties.

Lifeng Tan, Xin Qiu, Cheng Wang, Zhichao Sun, Xiaohui Hou, Jiabao Qiao, Chen Yang, Jingyi Xin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lifeng Tan *School of Architecture, Tianjin Chengjian University, Tianjin, 300192, China.
Xin QiuSchool of Architecture, Tianjin Chengjian University, Tianjin, 300192, China.
Cheng Wang *School of Urban Arts, Tianjin Chengjian University, Tianjin, 300192, China. cheng_gsa@163.com.
Zhichao SunSchool of Architecture, Tianjin Chengjian University, Tianjin, 300192, China.
Xiaohui HouSchool of Architecture, Tianjin Chengjian University, Tianjin, 300192, China.
Jiabao QiaoSchool of Architecture, Tianjin Chengjian University, Tianjin, 300192, China.
Chen YangSchool of Architecture, Tianjin Chengjian University, Tianjin, 300192, China.
Jingyi XinSchool of Architecture, Tianjin Chengjian University, Tianjin, 300192, China. 1720858713@qq.com.

Funding

the Ministry of Education's Humanities and Social Sciences No. 23YJC760115The National Natural Science Foundation project 52078324
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Beijing-Hangzhou Grand Canal, as the longest artificial waterway in the world, preserves a significant number of water engineering facilities along its route. During the Ming and Qing dynasties, water transport of grain peaked, and these facilities played a crucial role in water resource management and navigation. To protect the historical value of the facilities, constructing a water engineering facility importance assessment model is crucial.In this study, the water engineering facilities in the Huitong River section were selected. Their Ming-Qing relationship network was built using UCINET6.769, and key indexes such as betweenness centrality were extracted for importance analysis. This study innovatively combines SNA, kernel density, and TOPSIS to build a comprehensive assessment system, first applied to cultural heritage protection, bringing new vitality to the field. The results indicate that compared to the Ming dynasty, the overall network scale of water engineering facilities in the Huitong River section expanded and became more dispersed during the Qing dynasty. Key facilities were primarily concentrated in the Northern Five Lakes and Nanyang Lake regions. Ultimately, the study produced a comprehensive ranking of the significance of water engineering facilities for both dynasties, revealing that the core facilities increased from 19 in the Ming dynasty to 31 in the Qing dynasty.

Indexed as

Huitong river section of the grand canalKernel density analysisThe importanceTOPSISUCINETWater engineering facilities

Identifiers

PMID40473682
PMCPMC12141623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.