ArticleScientific reports2025
Resilience assessment of urban connected infrastructure networks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With the development of society, infrastructures have not only expanded in size, but have also formed complex dependencies among themselves, constituting closely interconnected network systems. At present, it has become a global consensus to enhance the resilience of infrastructure networks. In order to deeply understand how the interconnections among urban infrastructure systems affect the resilience performance of cities, this study adopts a combination of theoretical discussions and Python simulation techniques to systematically analyze the resilience dynamics of urban connected infrastructure networks when they encounter external perturbations. First, based on the principle of resilience construction and the multilayer network theoretical framework, we constructed a linkage model of the urban infrastructure network. Subsequently, focusing on the functional linkage perspective, we simulate the cascading failure mechanism of the network under three different external shocks, and construct a resilience assessment model for the urban infrastructure network with the help of the curve method of infrastructure system performance assessment. Finally, an empirical study is conducted with a county in Jiangxi Province as a specific case.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.