Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40473659›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Enhancing pancreatic cancer detection in CT images through secretary wolf bird optimization and deep learning.

Sandhya Mekala, Phani Kumar S

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sandhya MekalaGITAM School of Technology, GITAM Deemed To Be University, Rudraram, Patancheru Mandal, Hyderabad, Telangana, 502329, India. smekala3@gitam.in.
Phani Kumar SGITAM School of Technology, GITAM Deemed To Be University, Rudraram, Patancheru Mandal, Hyderabad, Telangana, 502329, India. psingams@gitam.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pancreas is a gland in the abdomen that helps to produce hormones and digest food. The irregular development of tissues in the pancreas is termed as pancreatic cancer. Identification of pancreatic tumors early is significant for enhancing survival rate and providing appropriate treatment. Thus, an efficient Secretary Wolf Bird Optimization (SeWBO)_Efficient DenseNet is presented for pancreatic tumor detection using Computed Tomography (CT) scans. Firstly, the input pancreatic CT image is accumulated from a database and subjected to image preprocessing using a bilateral filter. After this, lesion is segmented by utilizing Parallel Reverse Attention Network (PraNet), and hyperparameters of PraNet are enhanced by using the proposed SeWBO. The SeWBO is designed by incorporating Wolf Bird Optimization (WBO) and the Secretary Bird Optimization Algorithm (SBOA). Then, features like Complete Local Binary Pattern (CLBP) with Discrete Wavelet Transformation (DWT), statistical features, and Shape Local Binary Texture (SLBT) are extracted. Finally, pancreatic tumor detection is performed by SeWBO_Efficient DenseNet. Here, Efficient DenseNet is developed by combining EfficientNet and DenseNet. Moreover, the proposed SeWBO_Efficient DenseNet achieves better True Negative Rate (TNR), accuracy, and True Positive Rate (TPR), of 93.596%, 94.635%, and 92.579%.

Indexed as

Deep LearningImage Processing, Computer-AssistedPancreatic NeoplasmsTomography, X-Ray ComputedAlgorithmsHumansClassificationComputed Tomography imagesDeep LearningDetectionPancreatic tumor

Identifiers

PMID40473659
PMCPMC12141495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.