SynthesisBritish journal of anaesthesia2025
Prediction models for postoperative pulmonary complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in British journal of anaesthesia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Risk assessment and prevention of postoperative and postprocedural respiratory failure: recommendations from an international expert panel.British journal of anaesthesia · 2026Guideline
- Preoperative inflammation-based biomarkers and postoperative pulmonary complications after lung resection for lung cancer: a systematic review with selective exploratory quantitative synthesis.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Preoperative inflammatory and immune-nutritional markers and postoperative pulmonary complications after gastric and colorectal cancer surgery: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Association between preoperative blood glucose levels and postoperative pneumonia in neurosurgical patients: a retrospective study.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Development and internal validation of a clinical nomogram for predicting major postoperative pulmonary complications following radical cystectomy: a retrospective cohort study.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Article
- Pathogen distribution and risk factors for nosocomial infections in the operating room: A case-control study.Medicine · 2026Article
- Development and External Validation of an Explainable Machine-Learning Model for Predicting Postoperative Pulmonary Complications in Older Adults Undergoing Degenerative Spine Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Emerging trends and hotspots in lung-protective ventilation from 2006 to 2025: a bibliometric analysis.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Article
- A Holistic Nursing Surveillance Decision Support System for Postoperative Pulmonary Complications After Abdominal Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Anesthetic management of a patient with acquired bronchobiliary fistula: a case report.BMC anesthesiology · 2026Article
- Perioperative Blood Biomarkers of Infectious and Non-Infectious Postoperative Pulmonary Complications: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Inflammatory biomarkers and physiological reserve: an explainable machine learning model for predicting postoperative pulmonary complications in elderly laparoscopic surgery.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- A prehabilitation-enhanced nomogram for predicting early pulmonary recovery failure after lung tumor surgery: development and multicenter validation.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Risk prediction of patients with perioperative pneumonia exacerbation being transferred to the ICU based on different machine learning methods.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Prediction of Postoperative Pulmonary Complications in Geriatric Patients with Hip Fracture Using Lung Ultrasonography Score and Diaphragmatic Mobility.Clinical interventions in aging · 2026Observational
- A machine learning-based predictive model for postoperative pulmonary complications in lung cancer and its SHAP interpretation.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Association and incremental predictive value of preoperative AISI and CALLY for postoperative pulmonary complications after McKeown esophagectomy following neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- The complex task of modelling artificial intelligence workflows for forecasting postoperative risk.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPostoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) increase mortality, hospital stays, and healthcare costs. Multivariable prediction models can guide patient care by identifying high-risk patients. The discriminative ability and potential for clinical impact of PPC prediction models remains unclear.
methodsWe systematically searched Cochrane, Embase, and PubMed (up to June 2024) for studies developing or validating prediction models for PPCs that reported c-statistic. The primary outcome was the c-statistic of prediction models for composite PPCs, and the secondary outcome was the c-statistic for individual PPCs, including pneumonia, respiratory failure, reintubation, and others. Data were extracted using the CHARMS checklist, and bias was assessed with PROBAST. For models with data from three or more cohorts, discrimination was synthesised by pooling c-statistic using Bayesian meta-analysis, with heterogeneity assessed through prediction intervals.
resultsA total of 123 studies were included, covering 116 prediction models for PPCs, with 14 models (1 004 029 patients) eligible for meta-analysis. The c-statistic of all models ranged from 0.614 to 0.996 (median 0.80), with 50% of models self-reporting good (c-statistic >0.8) discrimination. In meta-analysis, the ARISCAT PPC score (summary c-statistic 0.76, 95% CI 0.67-0.86), Xue's model (0.82, 0.75-0.89), and CARDOT score (0.73, 0.61-0.85) demonstrated moderate (c-statistic 0.7-0.8) to good discrimination for composite PPCs; the DAGDA score (0.81, 0.74-0.88), Wang's model (0.78, 0.70-0.86), and Jin's model (0.75, 0.68-0.82) for postoperative pneumonia; and Yoon's model (0.90, 0.84-0.96) and Nizamuddin's model (0.85, 0.78-0.92) for postoperative respiratory failure. The reliability of these models, however, is currently limited by the lack of external validation cohorts. Overall, 90.2% of models were assessed as having a high risk of bias.
conclusionsMany prediction models postoperative pulmonary complications have been developed, but the clinical utility of the vast majority remains uncertain. CLINICAL
trial registrationPROSPERO database (CRD42024580216).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.