Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40473481›Full record

ArticleBJGP open2025

Effectiveness of the Positive Nursing Practice Environment Promotion Programme in improving patient safety in primary health care: a study protocol for a randomised controlled clinical trial.

Soraia Cristina de Abreu Pereira, Eduardo José Ferreira Santos, Cintia Silva Fassarella, Olga Maria Pimenta Lopes Ribeiro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJGP open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Soraia Cristina de Abreu PereiraAbel Salazar Biomedical Sciences Institute, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal pereirasoraia87@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8011-378X
Eduardo José Ferreira SantosRISE-Health, Porto, Portugal.
Cintia Silva FassarellaFaculty of Nursing, The State University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Olga Maria Pimenta Lopes RibeiroRISE-Health, Porto, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the past decade, interest in researching nursing practice environments has increased considerably. Multiple studies have highlighted that substantial benefits result from enhancing these environments. A strong association has been established between the nursing practice environment and key factors such as professional satisfaction, safety climate, staff retention, and the quality and safety of care delivered.

aimTo evaluate the effectiveness of the Positive Nursing Practice Environment Promotion Programme (PPAPEP) in improving patient safety in primary health care. DESIGN &

settingA randomised clinical trial will compare changes in nurses' perceptions of the safety climate and nursing practice environment in primary healthcare units. The sample will include at least 34 nurses participating in the programme and currently working in primary healthcare units. The sociodemographic and professional characteristics of the participants will be analysed, and stratified randomisation will be conducted.

methodThe intervention group will participate in the PPAPEP, consisting of six training sessions, each lasting 3 hours. The programme's goal is to empower nurses by providing knowledge about what constitutes a positive nursing practice environment and equipping them with tools to improve their practice environment. The outcomes of the intervention will be assessed both at the end of the programme and 3 months after its conclusion.

conclusionWe anticipate that this study will provide valuable insights into the effectiveness of a capacity-building programme targeted at nurses and its impact on their perceptions regarding the safety climate and nursing practice environment.

Indexed as

patient safetyprimary health careworking conditions

Identifiers

PMID40473481
PMCPMC12820510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.