Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40473437›Full record

Trial reportBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2025

Sacituzumab tirumotecan versus docetaxel for previously treated

Wenfeng Fang, Xingya Li, Qiming Wang, Xiangjiao Meng, Wei Zheng, Longhua Sun, Wenxiu Yao, Wu Zhuang, Yun Fan, Minglei Zhuo and 9 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter StudyComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT05631262 (A Multicenter, Open-label, Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of SKB264 Monotherapy in Selected Subjects With Advanced Solid Tumors), which is not on this map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05631262 phase2active not recruitingnot on this map

A Multicenter, Open-label, Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of SKB264 Monotherapy in Selected Subjects With Advanced Solid Tumors

TypeinterventionalSponsorSichuan Kelun-Biotech Biopharmaceutical Co., Ltd.Ran2022 to 2026Enrolled321ConditionsSelected Subjects With Advanced Solid TumorsArmsSKB264, Docetaxel
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. SUSD2 suppresses lung adenocarcinoma tumorigenesis by inducing autophagyEuropean journal of histochemistry : EJH · 2026
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Izalontamab Brengitecan in Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With Actionable Genomic Alterations Outside of ClassicalJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2026
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Wenfeng FangDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Centre for Cancer, Guangzhou, China.
Xingya LiOncology Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Qiming WangDepartment of Internal Medicine, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University and Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Xiangjiao MengDepartment of Thoracic Radiotherapy, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China.
Wei ZhengOncology Department, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Longhua SunDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Wenxiu YaoDepartment of Thoracic Medical Oncology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital, Chengdu, China.
Wu ZhuangDepartment of Thoracic Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Yun FanDepartment of Thoracic Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
Minglei ZhuoDepartment of Thoracic Oncology, Beijing Cancer Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yongzhong LuoDepartment of Thoracic Medicine, Hunan Cancer Hospital, Changsha, China.
Zhiye ZhangOncology Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, China.
Xia SongRespiratory Department, Shanxi Cancer Hospital, Taiyuan, China.
Runxiang YangDepartment of Internal Medicine 2, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China.
Jiacheng YangClinical Research Centre, Sichuan Kelun-Biotech Biopharmaceutical, Chengdu, China.
Xiaoping JinClinical Research Centre, Sichuan Kelun-Biotech Biopharmaceutical, Chengdu, China.
Yina DiaoClinical Research Centre, Sichuan Kelun-Biotech Biopharmaceutical, Chengdu, China.
Junyou GeNational Engineering Research Centre of Targeted Biologics, Chengdu, China.
Li ZhangDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Centre for Cancer, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0595-0761

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare the efficacy and safety of sacituzumab tirumotecan (sac-TMT) with docetaxel in patients with locally advanced or metastatic epidermal growth factor receptor (

designMulticentre, open label, randomised controlled trial.

setting48 centres in China, 1 September 2023 to 31 December 2024.

participants137 adults (aged 18-75 years) with

interventionPatients were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive sac-TMT (5 mg/kg) on days 1 and 15 of each four week cycle, or docetaxel (75 mg/m

main outcome measuresThe primary endpoint was objective response rate as assessed by a blinded independent review committee (BIRC). The secondary endpoints included objective response rate assessed by the investigator; disease control rate, progression-free survival, time to response, and duration of response assessed by BIRC and the investigator; overall survival; and safety.

results137 patients were randomised to receive sac-TMT (n=91) or docetaxel (n=46). Median follow-up was 12.2 months at the data cut-off for efficacy (31 December 2024). BIRC assessed objective response rate was significantly higher in the sac-TMT group (45% (41/91))

conclusionsSac-TMT showed statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in objective response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival compared with docetaxel, with a manageable safety profile in patients with

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT05631262.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungDocetaxelLung NeoplasmsAdolescentAdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsErbB ReceptorsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMutationYoung AdultAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedDocetaxelEGFR protein, humanErbB Receptors

Identifiers

PMID40473437
PMCPMC12139608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.