ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2025
What deters GPs from talking about sexual assault? a qualitative interview study.
Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- What deters GPs from talking about sexual assault?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSexual assault affects overall health due to its somatic, psychological, and social consequences. Many survivors will present their health issues to GPs, unaware of the relationship between their symptoms and their history. Studies on intimate partner violence (IPV) show that GPs often lack the competencies to recognise and discuss IPV, which leads to substandard care. This leads to the research question of whether this also applies to sexual assault.
aimTo explore GPs' experiences regarding the identification and discussion of sexual assault. DESIGN &
settingQualitative study using semi-structured interviews with GPs in the Netherlands.
methodInterviews were conducted with 14 GPs between March and August 2023. The interviews were transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis.
resultsMost GPs thought sexual assault should be discussed in their consulting rooms. Although both barriers and facilitators were explored, GPs talked predominantly about barriers. Professionally, they felt hampered by the tendency to approach symptoms from a biomedical perspective and by their fixation on problem solving. Emotional resistance and discomfort also prevented them from discussing sexual assault. Female doctors struggled to remain aware that males can also be victims of sexual assault, and male doctors were reluctant to discuss sexual assault with female victims because of a fear of doing harm.
conclusionThis study provides insights into why GPs find it hard to talk about sexual assault. The findings indicate that they should be offered training that tackles the issues raised in order to become competent at recognising and discussing sexual assault with survivors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.