ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2026
General practice consultation patterns and patient factors predicting older patients' use of out-of-hours services: a nationwide register-based cohort study.
Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Older immigrants' use of general practice in Denmark a register-based cohort study.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2026Article
- Real-World Analysis of Organ Transplantation-Specific Agent Based on Large Language Model in Post-Transplant Self-Management During Off-Hours: A Mixed-Methods Study.Current medical science · 2026Article
- Grief trajectories and long-term health effects in bereaved relatives: a prospective, population-based cohort study with ten-year follow-up.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOut-of-hours primary care services cannot provide the same continuity and coordination of care as daytime general practice. Thus, patients with high risk of complex care trajectories should, when possible, be seen by the GP during daytime opening hours. However, little is known about how provision of daytime consultation services affects older patients' out-of-hours healthcare seeking.
aimTo analyse how patient characteristics and general practices' patterns of daytime consultations relates to their older patients' use of out-of-hours services. DESIGN AND
settingThis was a register-based cohort study of all Danish citizens aged ≥75 years in the Northern, Central, Southern, and Zealand Region of Denmark in 2017-2021.
methodThe general practices' frequencies of daytime consultations were adjusted for patient population characteristics. Latent profile analysis identified group patterns of daytime consultation types and frequencies. Zero-inflated Poisson regression was used to analyse how patient characteristics and practice pattern of daytime consultations were associated with older patients' use of out-of-hours primary care.
resultsIncreasing age, multimorbidity, number of drugs, level of home healthcare services, and non-Western ethnicity were associated with being a user of out-of-hours services and higher frequency of consultations. Older patients in the general practices that provided substantially more daytime consultations than most general practices had no fewer consultations in out-of-hours primary care services.
conclusionUse of out-of-hours primary care services depends more on patient characteristics than general practice organisation of daytime consultations. The findings suggest that increasing the number of daytime consultations may not reduce use of out-of-hours services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.