Trial reportThorax2025
Optimised oxygenation improves functional capacity during daily activities in patients with COPD on long-term oxygen therapy: a randomised crossover trial.
Trial report in Thorax, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05553847 (Automated Oxygen Titration to Improve Activities of Daily Living in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease on Home Oxygen), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Automated Oxygen Titration to Improve Activities of Daily Living in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease on Home Oxygen
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Long-Term Oxygen Therapy and Cognitive Function in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review.Pulmonary medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Automated Oxygen Delivery in Home Setting for Patients with COPD on Long-Term Oxygen Therapy - A Randomized Crossover Feasibility Trial.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2025Trial
- Automatic oxygen titration during exercise in pulmonary rehabilitation: a pilot trial.ERJ open research · 2026Article
- The future of home oxygen therapy.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026Review
- Products, Performance, and Technological Development of Ambulatory Oxygen Therapy Devices: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMinimising hypoxaemia during submaximal walking tests has a positive effect on exercise capacity and dyspnoea in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) on long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT). However, the impact of optimising oxygenation during everyday tasks remains unexplored. Therefore, we investigated the effects of maintaining a target saturation on activities of daily living (ADL) using automated oxygen titration compared with conventional fixed oxygen flow.
methodsIn a double-blinded, randomised crossover trial, patients with COPD on LTOT performed two GlittreADL tests to assess the functional capacity of everyday activities using (1) their fixed oxygen dose and (2) an adjusted flow from 0 to 8 L/min targeting a peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO
results31 patients (mean±SD age: 72.8±5.9 years, forced expiratory volume in 1 s of % predicted: 36.7±12.7) were included. The patients reduced the time to perform the ADL test by median (IQR) 38 (12-73) s, p<0.001, using automated titration compared with the fixed oxygen flow. The oxygen flow in the automated arm more than tripled to 5.4 (4.1-6.8) versus 1.6 (1.1-2.1) L/min (fixed) during the test, p<0.001, while the time spent within SpO
conclusionsImproving oxygenation and extending the time spent within target saturation reduced dyspnoea and improved functional capacity in ADL in patients with COPD on LTOT. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05553847.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.