Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40473286›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Secondary prevention by striking the balance in 24-hour movement behaviour by empowering people at risk with a stroke: rationale and design of the RISE intervention randomised controlled trial.

Camille F M Biemans, Yvonne A W Hartman, Suzanne Broers, Sophie Pagen, Wendy Hendrickx, RISE Study Group, Johanna M van Dongen, Olaf W Verschuren, Coralie English, Cindy Veenhof and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06124248 (RISE Intervention), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06124248 narecruitingnot on this map

RISE Intervention: Heading to Sustainable Movement Behavioural Change in People with Stroke

TypeinterventionalSponsorUMC UtrechtRan2023 to 2027Enrolled1,000ConditionsSedentary Behaviour, StrokeArmsRISE intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Camille F M BiemansDepartment of Rehabilitation, Physiotherapy Science and Sport, University Medical Centre Utrecht Brain Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6734-9907
Yvonne A W HartmanDepartment of Rehabilitation, Physiotherapy Science and Sport, University Medical Centre Utrecht Brain Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Suzanne BroersDepartment of Rehabilitation, Physiotherapy Science and Sport, University Medical Centre Utrecht Brain Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Sophie PagenDepartment of Rehabilitation, Physiotherapy Science and Sport, University Medical Centre Utrecht Brain Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Wendy HendrickxDepartment of Rehabilitation, Physiotherapy Science and Sport, University Medical Centre Utrecht Brain Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
RISE Study Group
Johanna M van DongenDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Olaf W VerschurenDepartment of Rehabilitation, Physiotherapy Science and Sport, University Medical Centre Utrecht Brain Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Coralie EnglishSchool of Health Sciences, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5910-7927
Cindy VeenhofDepartment of Rehabilitation, Physiotherapy Science and Sport, University Medical Centre Utrecht Brain Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Johanna M A Visser-MeilyDepartment of Rehabilitation, Physiotherapy Science and Sport, University Medical Centre Utrecht Brain Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Martijn F PistersDepartment of Rehabilitation, Physiotherapy Science and Sport, University Medical Centre Utrecht Brain Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands M.F.Pisters@umcutrecht.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionStriking the balance in 24-hour movement behaviour (sedentary behaviour, physical activity and sleep) is expected to reduce the risk of a new major cardiovascular event or death (MACE). We aim to determine the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the RISE ( METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This assessor-blinded multicentre randomised controlled trial includes about 1000 participants with a first-ever stroke, of which 752 participants require secondary prevention based on their 24-hour movement behaviour. Participants will be randomly assigned to the experimental group (RISE intervention + usual care) or control (usual care) group. RISE is a 15-week blended care intervention: primary care physiotherapists coach people in their home setting using behaviour change techniques and the RISE eCoaching system. This system consists of: (1) an activity monitor, (2) a smartphone application that provides real-time feedback and contains e-learning modules and (3) a monitoring dashboard for the physiotherapist. A close relative of the participant is involved during the intervention to provide social support. The primary outcome is the effectiveness of the RISE intervention regarding the prevention of MACE measured at one year post randomisation using survival analysis comparing the experimental and control groups. Secondary outcomes include cost-effectiveness for MACE prevention and QALYs and changes in 24-hour movement behaviour over time using compositional data analysis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is obtained from Medical Ethics Review Committee Utrecht, NedMec NL83940.000.23. Findings will be disseminated through international peer-reviewed journals and conferences. A sustainable 24-hour movement behaviour change is needed to gain long-term benefits of lowering MACE in patients with stroke. The RISE intervention offers this foundation by integrating behaviour change techniques, the RISE eCoaching system, involvement of participatory support and extensively trained RISE physiotherapists. Consequently, the RISE intervention is expected to be (cost-)effective compared with usual care, and hence, this study will offer a foundation for implementing the RISE intervention in standard poststroke care. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06124248.

Indexed as

ExerciseSecondary PreventionSedentary BehaviorStrokeStroke RehabilitationCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleHumansMaleMulticenter Studies as TopicQuality-Adjusted Life YearsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSleepBehaviorCardiovascular DiseaseExercisePREVENTIVE MEDICINESLEEP MEDICINESTROKE MEDICINE

Identifiers

PMID40473286
PMCPMC12142160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.