Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40473280›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Multicentre pragmatic embedded stepped wedge cluster randomised trial comparing glucose 5% with sodium chloride 0.9% as the default drug diluent in the ICU: the sweet-water trial protocol.

Jan-Hendrik Bernhard Hardenberg, Ricarda Merle Hinz, Mareen Pigorsch, Alexander Uhrig, Holger Müller-Redetzky, Jens Nee, Tim Schroeder, Martin Witzenrath, Ulrike Trost, Daniel Zickler and 15 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Jan-Hendrik Bernhard Hardenberg *Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany Jan.hardenberg@charite.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9548-2118
Ricarda Merle Hinz *Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Mareen PigorschInstitute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Alexander UhrigDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Respiratory Medicine and Critical Care, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Holger Müller-RedetzkyDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Respiratory Medicine and Critical Care, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Jens NeeDepartment of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Tim SchroederDepartment of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Martin WitzenrathDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Respiratory Medicine and Critical Care, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Ulrike TrostDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Respiratory Medicine and Critical Care, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Daniel ZicklerDepartment of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, St Joseph Krankenhaus Berlin-Tempelhof, Berlin, Germany.
Oliver HunsickerDepartment of Anesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care Medicine (CCM, CVK), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Bjoern WeissDepartment of Anesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care Medicine (CCM, CVK), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Steffen Weber-CarstensDepartment of Anesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care Medicine (CCM, CVK), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Claudia SpiesDepartment of Anesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care Medicine (CCM, CVK), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1062-0495
Björn TampeUniversitätsmedizin Göttingen, Gottingen, Germany.
Rainer BorgstedtDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency Medicine, Transfusion Medicine and Pain Therapy, University Medical Center OWL Bielefeld University, Campus Bielefeld-Bethel, Bielefeld, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2870-745X
Mariam Abu-TairDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency Medicine, Transfusion Medicine and Pain Therapy, University Medical Center OWL Bielefeld University, Campus Bielefeld-Bethel, Bielefeld, Germany.
Alexander ZarbockDepartment of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Munster, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2124-1714
Christian StraußDepartment of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Munster, Germany.
Heiko SchenkDepartment of Nephrology and Hypertension, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Uta HildebrandDepartment of Nephrology and Hypertension, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Dario von WedelInstitute of Medical Informatics, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Felix BalzerInstitute of Medical Informatics, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6789-8471
Kai-Uwe EckardtDepartment of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Philipp EnghardDepartment of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHypernatraemia, defined as a plasma sodium concentration >145 mmol/L, is a frequent complication in critically ill patients treated in the intensive care unit (ICU) (= ICU-acquired hypernatraemia), with reported prevalence ranging from 4% to 26%. Hypernatraemia adversely affects various physiological functions and is associated with delirium, prolonged length of stay and increased ICU and post-discharge mortality. The sodium load from intravenous drug diluents significantly contributes to ICU-acquired hypernatraemia, with drug infusions comprising about 30% of the daily fluid volume of an average ICU patient. This study aims to investigate if using glucose 5% solution as the default drug diluent, instead of sodium chloride 0.9%, can reduce the prevalence of ICU-acquired hypernatraemia and improve patient outcomes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: To test the effectiveness of glucose 5% solution as the default drug diluent, we will conduct a multicentre, pragmatic, embedded, open-label, stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised trial. The study will include twelve clusters (ICUs and one intermediate care unit) across six hospitals in Germany, with a projected total sample size of 4485 patients. In line with the stepped-wedge cluster-randomised design, one ICU will transition every 4 weeks, in a randomised sequence, from using sodium chloride 0.9% as the default drug diluent to glucose 5%.The primary endpoint is the prevalence of hypernatraemia >150 mmol/L through day 28. The number of days alive and free of the ICU through day 28 will be tested hierarchically as a key secondary endpoint. Other exploratory endpoints include ICU mortality, ICU-free days, hospital-free days and other clinical outcomes. The primary endpoint will be analysed using a logistic mixed-effects model. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The trial was approved by the Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin Ethics Board and by the ethics board of each enrolled hospital. The results will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at one or more scientific conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: The trial protocol was registered with the German Clinical Trials Register on 21 June 2024 prior to initiation of patient enrolment (DRKS00033397).

Indexed as

GlucoseHypernatremiaIntensive Care UnitsSodium ChlorideCritical IllnessGermanyHumansInfusions, IntravenousMulticenter Studies as TopicPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicGlucoseSodium ChlorideAdult intensive & critical careINTENSIVE & CRITICAL CARENEPHROLOGY

Identifiers

PMID40473280
PMCPMC12142121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.