Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40473279›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Maintenance with niraparib in patients with stage III, stage IV, chemo-naïve recurrent or platinum-sensitive recurrent uterine serous carcinoma: study protocol for a phase II clinical trial.

Marina Frimer, Arielle Katcher, Pegah Blustein, Cristina Sison, Eugenia Girda, Aaron Nizam, Joan Tymon-Rosario, Gary L Goldberg, Andrew Menzin, Fidel Valea and 13 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Marina FrimerFeinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Manhasset, New York, USA mfrimer@northwell.edu.
Arielle KatcherDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, New Hyde Park, New York, USA.
Pegah BlusteinGynecologic Oncology, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Queens, New York, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9054-2230
Cristina SisonFeinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Manhasset, New York, USA.
Eugenia GirdaRutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
Aaron NizamGynecologic Oncology of Middle Tennessee, TriStar Centennial Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Joan Tymon-RosarioDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, New Hyde Park, New York, USA.
Gary L GoldbergFeinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Manhasset, New York, USA.
Andrew MenzinFeinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Manhasset, New York, USA.
Fidel ValeaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, New Hyde Park, New York, USA.
Lauren ScanlonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, New Hyde Park, New York, USA.
Jill S WhyteDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, New Hyde Park, New York, USA.
Antoinette SakarisDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, South Shore University Hospital, Bay Shore, New York, USA.
Elena PereiraObstetrics and Gynecology, Gynecologic Oncology, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, New York, USA.
Jeannine VillellaObstetrics and Gynecology, Gynecologic Oncology, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, New York, USA.
Yi-Shin D KuoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, New Hyde Park, New York, USA.
Jean LeeDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, New Hyde Park, New York, USA.
Marisa SiebelDivision of Medical Oncology, Huntington Hospital, Greenlawn, New York, USA.
Natalie DanzigerPathology and Diagnostic Medicine, Foundation Medicine Inc, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Julia ElvinPathology and Diagnostic Medicine, Foundation Medicine Inc, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Karin ShihDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, New Hyde Park, New York, USA.
Lisa Dos SantosDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, New Hyde Park, New York, USA.
Veena JohnDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, New Hyde Park, New York, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionUterine serous carcinoma (USC) accounts for 40% of endometrial cancer-related deaths. The standard of care for stages III and IV USC yields a 20%-30% survival at 2 years and a 10%-20% survival at 3-5 years. Recent advances in the second-line treatment of advanced or recurrent USC are rapidly evolving. Targeted therapeutic approaches with the use of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab, as well as the use of trastuzumab deruxtecan, offer new hope for successful second-line therapies for patients. However, further investigation into novel targeted therapeutic approaches is warranted, given the high burden of disease associated with this aggressive histological subtype. USC shares clinical and genomic similarities with epithelial ovarian cancer, suggesting a correlation with 'BRCAness'. Niraparib, a potent PARP1 and PARP2 inhibitor, was shown to have a positive impact on platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer, regardless of the presence or absence of BRCA status. Our hypothesis is that patients with stage III, stage IV and platinum-sensitive recurrent USC receiving niraparib maintenance in addition to standard therapy for USC may have an improved progression-free survival. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Participating sites include the primary site, Northwell Health Zucker Cancer Centre, and secondary site, Rutgers Cancer Institute of NJ. Females over the age of 18 with stage III, stage IV or platinum-sensitive recurrent USC will be recruited and enrolled based on inclusion/exclusion criteria. 24 subjects will be enrolled during phase 1 and 21 subjects will be enrolled during phase 2, over a total of 3 years. Patients will receive an individualised dose of niraparib daily every 28 days per cycle for 1 year or until progression of disease. Follow-up of disease status will continue for 5 years poststudy treatment. This phase II clinical trial will employ a Simon two-stage minimax design to test the null hypothesis that the 1 year response rate is <20% versus the alternative hypothesis that the 1 year response rate is ≥40%, with alpha=0.05 and power=0.90. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was granted by Northwell Health Cancer Institute institutional review board (reference number: 19-0380) and PRMS. Alongside journal publications, results will be available publicly on completion of the study as approved by the sponsor investigator. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCTN04080284.

Indexed as

Cystadenocarcinoma, SerousIndazolesNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPiperidinesPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase InhibitorsUterine NeoplasmsClinical Trials, Phase II as TopicFemaleHumansMaintenance ChemotherapyNeoplasm StagingIndazolesniraparibPiperidinesPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase InhibitorsCancer geneticsClinical TrialGynaecological oncologyIMMUNOLOGYProtocols & guidelines

Identifiers

PMID40473279
PMCPMC12142135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.