ArticleBMJ open ophthalmology2025
Early years examination to identify suspect cerebral visual impairment (EYE-CVI): a feasibility study.
Article in BMJ open ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveEarly identification of cerebral visual impairment (CVI) is important in providing timely educational support. This study explores the feasibility of early years teachers (EYT) administering in-nursery assessments of visual function. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: EYT within six nursery settings were recruited and underwent training and supervision in visual acuity and tablet-delivered visuoperceptual testing (children's visual impairment test; CVIT 3-6). Binocular visual acuity was recorded at 1.5 m and 33 cm. A crowding ratio was calculated if visual acuity was poorer than 0.3 logMAR. Engagement scores were completed to offer insights into areas of testing children found easiest/hardest to engage with.
resultsFour nursery settings completed training and the families of 37 children aged 3-4 years consented to participate; 97% of participants completed acuity testing (mean testing time 5 min) and 86% participants underwent CVIT 3-6 testing (mean testing time 15 min). Mean CVIT 3-6 score was 54.6/70, (expected 10th centile score for age=53). Only 55% children completed all 14 CVIT 3-6 domains. The subtests with poor performance in all three areas (pass rate, completion rate and engagement score) were 'structure from motion', 'missing part' and 'coherent motion'.
conclusionTraining EYT to administer visual function testing is feasible, in that some elements can be conducted in all children with a reasonably short test time. Further studies are required to identify which visuoperceptual testing domains offer the highest sensitivity/specificity for CVI-related visual dysfunction in this age group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.