Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40473273›Full record

ArticleBMJ open ophthalmology2025

Early years examination to identify suspect cerebral visual impairment (EYE-CVI): a feasibility study.

Brendan T Barrett, Kathleen Vancleef, Rachel F Pilling

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Brendan T BarrettSchool of Optometry & Vision Science, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK.
Kathleen VancleefDepartment of Psychology, Durham University, Durham, UK.
Rachel F PillingSchool of Optometry & Vision Science, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK Rachel.Pilling@bthft.nhs.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-7191-8255

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveEarly identification of cerebral visual impairment (CVI) is important in providing timely educational support. This study explores the feasibility of early years teachers (EYT) administering in-nursery assessments of visual function. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: EYT within six nursery settings were recruited and underwent training and supervision in visual acuity and tablet-delivered visuoperceptual testing (children's visual impairment test; CVIT 3-6). Binocular visual acuity was recorded at 1.5 m and 33 cm. A crowding ratio was calculated if visual acuity was poorer than 0.3 logMAR. Engagement scores were completed to offer insights into areas of testing children found easiest/hardest to engage with.

resultsFour nursery settings completed training and the families of 37 children aged 3-4 years consented to participate; 97% of participants completed acuity testing (mean testing time 5 min) and 86% participants underwent CVIT 3-6 testing (mean testing time 15 min). Mean CVIT 3-6 score was 54.6/70, (expected 10th centile score for age=53). Only 55% children completed all 14 CVIT 3-6 domains. The subtests with poor performance in all three areas (pass rate, completion rate and engagement score) were 'structure from motion', 'missing part' and 'coherent motion'.

conclusionTraining EYT to administer visual function testing is feasible, in that some elements can be conducted in all children with a reasonably short test time. Further studies are required to identify which visuoperceptual testing domains offer the highest sensitivity/specificity for CVI-related visual dysfunction in this age group.

Indexed as

Vision, BinocularVision DisordersVision TestsVisual AcuityChild, PreschoolEarly DiagnosisFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleChild health (paediatrics)VisionVisual (cerebral) CortexVisual perception

Identifiers

PMID40473273
PMCPMC12142150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.