Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40472583›Full record

ArticleNeural networks : the official journal of the International Neural Network Society2025

Self-supervised brain lesion generation for effective data augmentation of medical images.

Jiayu Huo, Sébastien Ourselin, Rachel Sparks

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neural networks : the official journal of the International Neural Network Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jiayu HuoSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences (BMEIS), King's College London, London, UK. Electronic address: jiayu.huo@kcl.ac.uk.
Sébastien OurselinSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences (BMEIS), King's College London, London, UK.
Rachel SparksSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences (BMEIS), King's College London, London, UK.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate brain lesion delineation is important for planning neurosurgical treatment. Automatic brain lesion segmentation methods based on convolutional neural networks have demonstrated remarkable performance. However, neural network performance is constrained by the lack of large-scale well-annotated training datasets. In this manuscript, we propose a comprehensive framework to efficiently generate new samples for training a brain lesion segmentation model. We first train a self-supervised lesion generator based on the adversarial autoencoder to model lesion appearance and shape. Next, we utilize a novel image composition algorithm, Soft Poisson Blending, to seamlessly combine synthetic lesions and brain images to obtain training samples. Finally, to effectively train the brain lesion segmentation model with augmented images we introduce a new prototype consistence regularization to align real and synthetic features. Our framework is validated by extensive experiments on two public brain lesion segmentation datasets: ATLAS v2.0 and Shift MS. Our method outperforms existing brain image data augmentation schemes. For instance, our method improves the Dice from 50.36% to 60.23% compared to the UNet with conventional data augmentation techniques for the ATLAS v2.0 dataset.

Indexed as

BrainImage Processing, Computer-AssistedNeural Networks, ComputerAlgorithmsBrain NeoplasmsDatabases, FactualHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingBrain lesion segmentationData augmentationPoisson blendingPrototype learning

Identifiers

PMID40472583
PMCPMC7619486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.