ArticleClinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology2025
Force control deficits in rapid eye movement behavior disorder and Parkinson's disease.
Article in Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to determine if there are deficits in force variability, force increase, force decrease and force errors in rapid eye movement behavior disorder (RBD) using established force control paradigms.
methodsA cohort of 27 controls, 37 RBD and 37 early-stage Parkinson's disease (PD) were investigated. Individuals completed constant force and ballistic force control for the finger and ankle.
resultsThere was greater force variability in RBD compared with controls and PD during the constant force tasks (p < 0.05). Additionally, we split the RBD group into those with mild and moderate motor impairments and found both groups had higher force variability compared with controls (p < 0.05). PD were slower at increasing and decreasing force (p < 0.05) and this was not observed in the RBD group.
conclusionThese findings provide new evidence that force variability may be one of the earliest markers of motor dysfunction in RBD before a subsequent diagnosis of neurological disease. SIGNIFICANCE: These findings provide new and important insights into the motor physiological changes in force control in RBD and PD, which may inform future biomarker studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.