Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40472336›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

SPectral graph theory And Random walK (SPARK) toolbox for static and dynamic characterization of (di)graphs: A tutorial.

Andrea Ranieri, Floriana Pichiorri, Emma Colamarino, Febo Cincotti, Donatella Mattia, Jlenia Toppi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Andrea RanieriDepartment of Computer, Control, and Management Engineering, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Floriana PichiorriNeuroelectrical Imaging and BCI Laboratory, IRCCS Fondazione Santa Lucia, Rome, Italy.
Emma ColamarinoDepartment of Computer, Control, and Management Engineering, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Febo CincottiDepartment of Computer, Control, and Management Engineering, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Donatella MattiaNeuroelectrical Imaging and BCI Laboratory, IRCCS Fondazione Santa Lucia, Rome, Italy.
Jlenia ToppiDepartment of Computer, Control, and Management Engineering, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8279-1699

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spectral graph theory and its applications constitute an important forward step in modern network theory. Its increasing consensus over the last decades fostered the development of innovative tools, allowing network theory to model a variety of different scenarios while answering questions of increasing complexity. Nevertheless, a comprehensive understanding of spectral graph theory's principles requires a solid technical background which, in many cases, prevents its diffusion through the scientific community. To overcome such an issue, we developed and released an open-source MATLAB toolbox - SPectral graph theory And Random walK (SPARK) toolbox - that combines spectral graph theory and random walk concepts to provide a both static and dynamic characterization of digraphs. Once described the theoretical principles grounding the toolbox, we presented SPARK structure and the list of available indices and measures. SPARK was then tested in a variety of scenarios including: two-toy examples on synthetic networks, an example using public datasets in which SPARK was used as an unsupervised binary classifier and a real data scenario relying on functional brain networks extracted from the EEG data recorded from two stroke patients in resting state condition. Results from both synthetic and real data showed that indices extracted using SPARK toolbox allow to correctly characterize the topology of a bi-compartmental network. Furthermore, they could also be used to find the "optimal" vertex set partition (i.e., the one that minimizes the number of between-cluster links) for the underlying network and compare it to a given a priori partition. Finally, the application to real EEG-based networks provides a practical case study where the SPARK toolbox was used to describe networks' alterations in stroke patients and put them in relation to their motor impairment.

Indexed as

SoftwareAlgorithmsBrainElectroencephalographyHumansStroke

Identifiers

PMID40472336
PMCPMC12140659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.