Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40472147›Full record

ArticleJournal of cardiovascular pharmacology2025

Differential Binding Affinities and Kinetics of Transthyretin Stabilizers.

Alan X Ji, Andreas Betz, Uma Sinha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiovascular pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alan X JiBridgeBio Pharma, Inc., San Francisco, CA.
Andreas Betz
Uma Sinha

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) is a progressive, fatal disease. Dissociation of tetrameric transthyretin (TTR) is the triggering event in the pathogenic mechanism; destabilizing TTR mutations accelerate the process. The TTR stabilizers, tafamidis and acoramidis, are the only FDA approved treatments for patients with ATTR-CM. By mimicking the stabilizing characteristics of the super-stabilizing, disease-protecting variant T119M, we hypothesize that acoramidis displays differential TTR binding, kinetic stability, and tetramer stabilization compared with other TTR stabilizers, such as tafamidis and diflunisal. The TTR binding affinity and thermodynamic stability of TTR interaction of acoramidis and tafamidis were assessed by surface plasmon resonance (SPR) and microscale thermophoresis (MST). Tetrameric TTR stabilization by acoramidis, tafamidis, and diflunisal in the presence of plasma proteins against acidic denaturation was measured by immune blots. In kinetic studies, SPR demonstrated 4 times longer residence time for acoramidis bound to TTR compared with tafamidis. The dissociation constants were consistent with those determined by equilibrium measurements in MST. The affinity of acoramidis for purified TTR, as measured by MST, was 4 times higher than that of tafamidis. When tested at clinically relevant plasma concentrations, acoramidis stabilized TTR against acidic denaturation to a much higher extent (≥90%) than tafamidis or diflunisal. Of note, both tafamidis and diflunisal demonstrated partial stabilization of tetrameric TTR. Relative to other stabilizers, acoramidis is more potent as independently assessed by TTR binding affinity, kinetic stability, and acid-mediated denaturation. These properties may contribute to the ability of acoramidis to achieve near-complete stabilization of TTR in plasma samples.

Indexed as

acoramidisATTR-CMbinding affinityTransthyretin

Identifiers

PMID40472147
PMCPMC12333512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.