ArticlePloS one2025
Point-based method for measuring the phenotypic data of channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus).
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In industrial societies, most fishery research institutes collect the phenotypic data of fish manually, which is time-consuming, labor-intensive, error-prone, and results in incomplete data. Considering their stress reaction and the natural body extension to collect the phenotypic data of fish quickly and accurately, channel catfish was used as the research subject and a deep-learning-based method was developed to explore their phenotypic data, i.e., body length, full length, head length, body height, tail handle width, tail handle height, and body thickness. First, this study applied two cameras and another device built into an image acquisition system to obtain images of fish in the water. We then adopted an Hourglass module network to position nine and ten key points on the top and side view images, building two key point fish skeletons. Finally, 3D coordinate transformation and scale parameters were employed to obtain the phenotypic data. Compared with the ground truth of the phenotypic fish data, our study achieved a 3.7% average relative error in terms of the full length, and an average 9.6% relative error for all seven types of phenotypic data applied. Furthermore, the average time required for the image processing measurements was approximately 1s.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.