ArticlePloS one2025
Forest structure, timber species regeneration, and timber volume dynamics along a logging gradient in a lowland tropical rainforest in Africa: Implications for biodiversity conservation and sustainable timber management.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Timber production, cutting and extraction is impacting vast areas of tropical forests, highlighting the need for management strategies to promote sustainable recovery of logged forests. However, limited information is available on how logging and enrichment planting affect forest structure, commercial tree species, and timber volume recovery. In this study, we assessed the effects of timber cutting and extraction ("logging") on forest structure, regeneration of key timber species, and volume recovery across different logging intensities. We compared the effects of enrichment planting, initiated over 60 years ago, versus natural regeneration on timber volume recovery of Khaya anthotheca (Welw.) C.DC., a highly targeted species. We inventoried all live stems with a diameter at breast height (DBH) of ≥2 cm across 9 compartments using 45 plots of 0.5 ha each: heavily logged forests (25 plots, totaling 12.5 ha), lightly logged forests (15 plots, totaling 7.5 ha), and unlogged forest (5 plots, totaling 2.5 ha). Our results suggest that timber production has impacted on tree regeneration of harvested timber species such Entandrophragma species, Milicia excelsa (Welw.) C. Berg, Olea capensis L. subsp. welwitschii (Knobl.) Friis & Green and Ricinodendron heudelotii (Baill.) Heckel; Timber volume recovery of harvested species was 61.3% lower in heavily logged and 51.7% lower in lightly logged forests compared to unlogged forest. Stem density, basal area, and timber volume recovery of mahogany species were influenced by time since last logging. Notably, the compartment which was logged earlier in 1945 and enriched with K. anthotheca showed significantly higher stem density and timber volume of this species compared to logged forests without such enrichment. In conclusion, our study suggests that passive regeneration in Budongo's logged compartments has been inadequate for achieving timber volume recovery of high-value commercial species. If an economic assessment proves favorable we recommend further trials of enrichment planting of high-value timber species (Mahogany spp., Milicia excelsa, and Olea capensis) alongside fast-growing species (Maesopsis eminii Engl., Albizia spp.). As well as Reduced Impact Logging and broader species selection from classes II and III, to reduce damage and enhance timber yields in production forests.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.