SynthesisPloS one2025
Interventions promoting occupational balance in adults: A systematic literature review.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Occupational Therapy Group Interventions Within the Area of Time Use and Occupational Balance: A Scoping Review.Occupational therapy international · 2026Article
- Occupational Balance in Refugees: The Role of Well-Being, Participation, and Perceived Discrimination.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionOccupational balance, the subjective perception of satisfaction and balance in engaging in meaningful activities, is fundamental to individuals' health and well-being. The detrimental impacts of decreased occupational balance are increasingly acknowledged, and interventions are emerging. A comprehensive review of these interventions, targeting occupational balance in adult populations, is needed to ensure effective implementation into both clinical and public health settings.
objectiveThis study aimed to systematically review and synthesize existing interventions that address occupational balance among adults in diverse contexts, and to evaluate their effectiveness.
methodA systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, and EMBASE in April 2024, following the PRISMA guidelines. Peer-reviewed articles published between 2000 and 2024, reporting quantitatively on interventions addressing occupational balance, were included. The NHLBI quality assessment tools were employed to evaluate the risk of bias. A narrative synthesis was performed.
resultsOf the 347 records identified, 18 publications were included in this review. Study designs comprised randomized controlled trials, observational studies, and pre-post studies. Most participants had specific diagnoses, with a predominance of mental health conditions. The review identified 12 interventions aimed at promoting occupational balance, providing an overview of interventions' target groups, goals, features, and content. Overall effectiveness of identified interventions varied across studies, with six demonstrating statistically significant improvements in occupational balance scores. Clinically meaningful changes were observed in areas such as drug craving, social isolation, and work ability.
conclusionThis review identified promising interventions for promoting occupational balance and enhancing health, well-being, and life satisfaction across various settings. Further research should employ controlled experimental designs to evaluate interventions addressing occupational balance across diverse populations, addressing gender and age differences while assessing effectiveness across delivery modes and settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.