ArticlePLOS digital health2025
Pharmacist-led rapid uptitration clinic in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction: Our experience within a virtual ward.
Article in PLOS digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Collaborative pharmacist prescribing in community heart failure clinics: a pre-post intervention comparison.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2026Observational
- Feasibility and acceptability of pharmacist-led remote patient monitoring for carvedilol dose titration in clinically significant portal hypertension.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2026Article
- Gaps in Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy for Heart Failure: A Cross-Sectional Study in an Underserved Population.Cureus · 2026Article
- Telehealth to reduce compound pressures on the National Health Service and social care: a multi-methods study protocol.Oxford open digital health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction is a chronic, progressive medical condition affecting millions of individuals worldwide. It is associated with high morbidity and mortality. The use of "foundational quadruple therapy" titrated to the maximum tolerated doses improves survival, quality of life, and reduces heart failure-related hospitalisation. Despite this evidence, there is a consistent trend of suboptimal dose up-titration, prolonged optimisation periods, and early therapy discontinuation. Virtual wards offer a potential innovative solution in transforming heart failure management by combining rapid medication optimisation with remote monitoring to improve patient outcomes. This retrospective study employed a single-group pre-post design to evaluate the effectiveness of a prescribing pharmacist in the rapid uptitration of Guidelines Directed Medical Therapy (GDMT) in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction within a virtual ward setting. The study assessed clinical outcomes of 86 patients at baseline, following discharge from the virtual ward (typically after 4 weeks), and at 3-6 months post-discharge. Improvements were seen in NYHA scores, cardiac systolic function, and Optimal Medical Therapy (OMT) scores. The median Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction increased from 29% at baseline to 39% post-optimisation, signifying improved myocardial performance and a reduction in the severity of left ventricular dysfunction. Post-optimisation, 37% of patients attained an optimal OMT score of 8, 52% attained an acceptable score (5-7), and only 5% remained in the suboptimal range (0-4). Additionally, 84% of patients were prescribed all four foundational therapies. There was no notable increase in adverse events such as hypotension, bradycardia, or hyperkalaemia. Remote up-titration of heart failure medications within a virtual ward environment is a promising approach, offering a fast, feasible, safe, and efficient treatment solution for patients who are otherwise undertreated.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.