ArticlePloS one2025
Identifying dynamic regulation with machine learning using adversarial surrogates.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biological systems maintain stability of their function in spite of external and internal perturbations. An important challenge in studying biological regulation is to identify the control objectives based on empirical data. Very often these objectives are time-varying, and require the regulation system to follow a dynamic set-point. For example, the sleep-wake cycle varies according to the 24 hours solar day, inducing oscillatory dynamics on the regulation set-point; nutrient availability fluctuates in the organism, inducing time-varying set-points for metabolism. In this work, we introduce a novel data-driven algorithm capable of identifying internal regulation objectives that are maintained with respect to a dynamic reference value. This builds on a previous algorithm that identified variables regulated with respect to fixed set-point values. The new algorithm requires adding a prediction component that not only identifies the internally regulated variables, but also predicts the dynamic set-point as part of the process. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first algorithm that is able to achieve this. We test the algorithm on simulation data from realistic biological models, demonstrating excellent empirical results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.