Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40471964›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Identifying dynamic regulation with machine learning using adversarial surrogates.

Ron Teichner, Naama Brenner, Ron Meir

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ron TeichnerViterbi Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-8627-1385
Naama BrennerNetwork Biology Research Laboratory, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
Ron MeirViterbi Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biological systems maintain stability of their function in spite of external and internal perturbations. An important challenge in studying biological regulation is to identify the control objectives based on empirical data. Very often these objectives are time-varying, and require the regulation system to follow a dynamic set-point. For example, the sleep-wake cycle varies according to the 24 hours solar day, inducing oscillatory dynamics on the regulation set-point; nutrient availability fluctuates in the organism, inducing time-varying set-points for metabolism. In this work, we introduce a novel data-driven algorithm capable of identifying internal regulation objectives that are maintained with respect to a dynamic reference value. This builds on a previous algorithm that identified variables regulated with respect to fixed set-point values. The new algorithm requires adding a prediction component that not only identifies the internally regulated variables, but also predicts the dynamic set-point as part of the process. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first algorithm that is able to achieve this. We test the algorithm on simulation data from realistic biological models, demonstrating excellent empirical results.

Indexed as

Machine LearningModels, BiologicalAlgorithmsComputer SimulationHumans

Identifiers

PMID40471964
PMCPMC12140394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.