Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40471958›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Fixation drift increases as a function of time-on-task in a brief saccade tracking study.

Lee Friedman, Oleg V Komogortsev

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lee FriedmanDepartment of Computer Science, Texas State University, San Marcos, Texas, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-6385-1035
Oleg V KomogortsevDepartment of Computer Science, Texas State University, San Marcos, Texas, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ocular fixations contain microsaccades, drift and tremor. We report an increase in the slope of linear fixation drift as a function of time-on-task (TOT). We employed a large dataset (322 subjects, multiple visits per subject). Subjects performed a random saccade task. The task, in which the target dot jumped randomly every one sec, was 100 sec in duration. For each fixation, we regressed eye position against time across multiple segment lengths (50, 100, 300, and 500 ms). We started with the first sample and continued until no further regressions were possible based on the segment length being evaluated. For each segment length, each fixation was characterized by a single value: the maximum slope over the segment length. The slopes were expressed in deg/sec. We were not interested in the direction of the linear drift, so we took the absolute value of the slope as a measure. For data analysis, each 100 sec task was divided into five 20 sec epochs. In an attempt to partially replicate an earlier study of fixation drift over time [1], we also measured drift as the mean velocity of an eye-position signal that had been low-pass filtered at 30 Hz. We found that both methods detected significant drift over our task. For each visit, subjects were tested in two sessions, approximately 20 min apart. Generally, we found statistically significant session effects indicating that drift started at a higher level and increased at a higher rate over the second session. We report that the mean velocity method detects distinctive types of drifting fixation trajectories including curvilinear drift and irregular oscillation. Our findings extend the observations of increased drift over time by [1] to other measures of drift and to a much shorter time interval (100 sec vs two hrs) and a simpler task.

Indexed as

Fixation, OcularSaccadesAdultFemaleHumansMaleTime FactorsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40471958
PMCPMC12140216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.