ArticlePloS one2025
Recognition of flight cadets brain functional magnetic resonance imaging data based on machine learning analysis.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rapid advancement of the civil aviation industry has attracted significant attention to research on pilots. However, the brain changes experienced by flight cadets following their training remain, to some extent, an unexplored territory compared to those of the general population. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of flight training on brain function by employing machine learning(ML) techniques. We collected resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (resting-state fMRI) data from 79 flight cadets and ground program cadets, extracting blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) signal, amplitude of low frequency fluctuation (ALFF), regional homogeneity (ReHo), and functional connectivity (FC) metrics as feature inputs for ML models. After conducting feature selection using a two-sample t-test, we established various ML classification models, including Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Logistic Regression (LR), Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Gaussian Naive Bayes (GNB). Comparative analysis of the model results revealed that the LR classifier based on BOLD signals could accurately distinguish flight cadets from the general population, achieving an AUC of 83.75% and an accuracy of 0.93. Furthermore, an analysis of the features contributing significantly to the ML classification models indicated that these features were predominantly located in brain regions associated with auditory-visual processing, motor function, emotional regulation, and cognition, primarily within the Default Mode Network (DMN), Visual Network (VN), and SomatoMotor Network (SMN). These findings suggest that flight-trained cadets may exhibit enhanced functional dynamics and cognitive flexibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.