Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40471954›Full record

ReviewACS applied materials & interfaces2025

Dry versus Wet Particle Assembly: Toward Solvent-Free Fabrication.

Ignaas S M Jimidar, Kai Sotthewes

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS applied materials & interfaces, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ignaas S M JimidarDepartment of Chemical Engineering CHIS, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels 1050, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-9653-1938
Kai SotthewesPhysics of Interfaces and Nanomaterials, MESA+ Institute, University of Twente, P.O. Box 217, Enschede 7500AE, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2073-6958

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For over three decades, the continuous demand for miniaturized devices has prompted scientists to explore the fundamental principles of colloidal or particle (10 nm to 10 μm) assembly to construct large ordered structures. So far, most of the assembly has been performed in wet conditions, i.e., in a solution. Over the past decade, solvent-free (or dry) assembly methods have gained more attention, offering a more sustainable alternative. In this perspective, we highlight the promising aspects of the dry assembly method, which is not only easy to use, rapidly performed, and clean but also abandons the use of solvents while ensuring that the quality of the created particle assembly matches or exceeds that of wet particle assemblies. However, challenges remain for ordered multilayers, binary layers, and nonspherical particle assemblies due to strong surface forces and limited control. Learning from strategies used in wet assembly and gaining a deeper fundamental understanding of surface interactions at the micro- and nanoscale could help bridge these gaps. In this perspective, the challenges and opportunities of dry particle assembly are thoroughly explored, providing a roadmap for advancing the solvent-free assembly field and contributing to a more sustainable world.

Indexed as

colloidal assemblydry particle assemblydry powder rubbingordered particle mono- and multilayerssolvent-free colloidal assembly

Identifiers

PMID40471954
PMCPMC12186230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.