Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40471940›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Advancing sentiment analysis for low-resourced african languages using pre-trained language models.

Koena Ronny Mabokela, Mpho Primus, Turgay Celik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Koena Ronny MabokelaSchool of Electrical & Information Engineering, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8058-969X
Mpho PrimusInstitute for Intelligent Systems, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Turgay CelikSchool of Electrical & Information Engineering, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6925-6010

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While sentiment analysis systems excel in high-resource languages, most African languages facing limited resources, remain under-represented. This gap leaves a significant portion of the world's population without access to technologies in their native languages. However, multilingual pre-trained language models (PLM) offer a promising approach for sentiment analysis in low-resource languages. Although the absence of large data in African languages poses a challenge for developing PLMs, fine-tuning and task adaptation of existing multilingual PLMs is an alternative solution. This paper explores the use of multilingual PLMs for sentiment analysis in five Southern African languages: Sepedi, Sesotho, Setswana, isiXhosa, and isiZulu. We leverage existing PLMs and fine-tune them for this specific task, avoiding training the models from scratch. Our work expands on the SAfriSenti corpus, a Twitter sentiment dataset for these languages. We employ various annotation techniques to create a labelled dataset and perform benchmark experiments utilising various multilingual PLMs. Our findings demonstrate the effectiveness of multilingual PLM, particularly for closely-related languages (Sotho-Tswana), where the ensemble PLMs method achieved an average weighted F1 score above 63%. In particular, Nguni closely-related languages achieved an even higher average weighted F1 score, exceeding 77%, highlighting the potential of PLMs for sentiment analysis in South African languages.

Indexed as

LanguageMultilingualismAfricaHumansSocial Media

Identifiers

PMID40471940
PMCPMC12140235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.