Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40471937›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

The influence of resource use on yield versus sale price trade-off in Australian vineyards.

Bryce Boyd, Kate Helmstedt, Mardi Longbottom, Kerrie Mengersen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bryce BoydFaculty of Mathematical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0009-0002-3330-437X
Kate HelmstedtFaculty of Mathematical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0201-5348
Mardi LongbottomAustralian Wine Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Kerrie MengersenFaculty of Mathematical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8625-9168

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Strategies for achieving sustainability in the winegrowing industry require balancing resource investment against the economic outcomes of resultant yields and sale price of the produce. Although there has been much research into forecasting outcomes and resource use, little has been done to illustrate their effects on one another and the consequential economic outcomes. This analysis uses statistical models to observe relationships between resource use, yield, and sale price. The dataset used for this analysis includes data collected for the past 10 years from 1261 vineyards located over a diverse range of Australian winegrowing regions. Yield and sale price were evaluated regarding resource use factors, such as water use and Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions. The analysis confirmed a strong relationship between area and resource use, with the overall area of a vineyard and its access to resources significantly determining the upper limit of yield. However, the area was also negatively related to the average sale price of grapes; we find that higher average sale prices were connected to high resource inputs per area rather than to the overall expenditure of resources. Regional and temporal effects on vineyard yield and average sales price were also identified. The analysis highlighted the importance of considering a vineyard's business goal, region, external pressures, and economies of scale when pursuing higher yields verse higher average sales prices.

Indexed as

AgricultureCommerceFarmsVitisWineAustralia

Identifiers

PMID40471937
PMCPMC12140259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.