ArticlePloS one2025
Modeling the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic and the efficacy of different vaccines across different network structures.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Simulating targeted vaccination strategies with network-based and agent-based models: A scoping review.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We developed a network-based SEIRV model to test different vaccine efficacies on SARS-CoV-2 (Betacoronavirus pandemicum) dynamics in a naive population of 25,000 susceptible adults. Different vaccine efficacies, derived from data, were administered at different rates across a range of different Watts-Strogatz network structures. The model suggests that differences among vaccines were of minor importance compared to vaccination rates and network structure. Additionally, we tested the effect of strain differences in transmissibility (R0 values of 2.5 and 5.0) and found that this was the most important factor influencing the number of individuals ultimately infected. However, network structure was most important in affecting the maximum number of individuals that were infectious during the epidemic peak. The interaction of network structure, vaccination effort, and difference in strain transmissibility was highly significant for all epidemic metrics. The model suggests that differences in vaccine efficacy are not as important as vaccination rate in reducing epidemic sizes. Further, the importance of the evolution of viral transmission rates and our ability to develop effective vaccines to combat these strains will be of primary concern for our ability to control future disease epidemics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.