ArticlePloS one2025
AI-delirium guard: Predictive modeling of postoperative delirium in elderly surgical patients.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Machine learning application in the prediction of postoperative delirium among elderly patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence in onco-anaesthesia: Current applications, challenges, and future directions.World journal of methodology · 2026Review
- Machine learning models for predicting postoperative delirium after noncardiac surgery: A comparative study.The Journal of international medical research · 2026Article
- Evaluation framework for assessing the quality and safety of artificial intelligence solutions for the acute care surgeon: a narrative review from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma quality, safety, and outcomes committee.Trauma surgery & acute care open · 2026Review
- From Bench to Bedside: New Frontiers in Understanding and Treating Postoperative Delirium.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIn older patients, postoperative delirium (POD) is a major complication that can result in greater morbidity, longer hospital stays, and higher healthcare expenses. Accurate prediction models for POD can enhance patient outcomes by guiding preventative strategies. This study utilizes advanced machine learning techniques to develop a predictive model for POD using comprehensive perioperative data.
methodsWe examined information from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP), which included 17,000 patients who were over 65 and undergoing different types of surgery. The dataset included variables such as patient demographics (age, sex), comorbidities (diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, pre-existing dementia), surgical details (type, duration), anesthesia type and dosage, and postoperative outcomes. Categorical variables were encoded numerically, and data standardization was applied to ensure normal distribution. A range of machine learning approaches were assessed such as Decision Trees and Random Forests. Based on the greatest Area Under the Curve (AUC) from Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis, the final model was chosen. Hyperparameter tuning was performed using GridSearchCV, optimizing parameters like max_depth, min_child_weight, and gamma for XGBoost model.
resultsThe optimized XGBoost model demonstrated superior performance, achieving an AUC of 0.85. Key hyperparameters included min_child_weight = 1, max_depth = 5, gamma = 0.3, subsample = 0.9, colsample_bytree = 0.7, reg_alpha = 0.0007, learning_rate = 0.14, and n_estimators = 123. The model exhibited an accuracy of 0.926, recall of 0.945, precision of 0.934, and an F1-score of 0.939, depicting a higher level of predictive accuracy & balance between sensitivity and specificity.
conclusionThis study proposes a strong XGBoost-based model to predict POD in older surgical patients, demonstrating the potential of Machine Learning (ML) in clinical risk assessment. With the help of the model's balanced performance indicators and high accuracy, physicians may identify high-risk patients and promptly execute interventions in clinical settings. Subsequent investigations ought to concentrate on integration into clinical workflows and external validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.