Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40471906›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2025

Neural evidence that humans reuse strategies to solve new tasks.

Sam Hall-McMaster, Momchil S Tomov, Samuel J Gershman, Nicolas W Schuck

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sam Hall-McMasterDepartment of Psychology and Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1641-979X
Momchil S TomovDepartment of Psychology and Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Samuel J GershmanDepartment of Psychology and Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Nicolas W SchuckMax Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

Alexander von Humboldt FellowshipArmy Research Office W911NF-21-1-0328Army Research Office W911NF-23-1-0277European UnionIndependent Max Planck Research GroupPhilip Wrightson Fellowship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Generalization from past experience is an important feature of intelligent systems. When faced with a new task, one efficient computational approach is to evaluate solutions to earlier tasks as candidates for reuse. Consistent with this idea, we found that human participants (n = 38) learned optimal solutions to a set of training tasks and generalized them to novel test tasks in a reward-selective manner. This behavior was consistent with a computational process based on the successor representation known as successor features and generalized policy improvement (SF&GPI). Neither model-free perseveration or model-based control using a complete model of the environment could explain choice behavior. Decoding from functional magnetic resonance imaging data revealed that solutions from the SF&GPI algorithm were activated on test tasks in visual and prefrontal cortex. This activation had a functional connection to behavior in that stronger activation of SF&GPI solutions in visual areas was associated with increased behavioral reuse. These findings point to a possible neural implementation of an adaptive algorithm for generalization across tasks.

Indexed as

LearningAdultAlgorithmsChoice BehaviorFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePrefrontal CortexRewardTask Performance and AnalysisYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40471906
PMCPMC12140246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.